the figure I posted was correct for known sources. The figure you have is for hypothesized sources. Are we going to be the future of our entire species on guesses or known things?
Have you looked up at the predictions of "when will oil reserves run out"? They've been at the state of "known oil reserves will run out in about 30-60 years" for more than half a century now.
However, we hit "peak oil" quite some time ago. All "new" oil exploration is very costly to harvest, which means less and less efficiency in the overall system between getting it out of the ground, and pushing electricity to your home. As we move further down the decline of that slope, the greater that inefficiency will become, until it becomes completely non-viable to get oil out of the ground at all. At that point, biosynthetic fossil fuel will be more economical than oilfeild exploration!
The problem with nuclear, at least in regards to fast breeder reactors, is that we cant legally make them-- again, because of foolish moratoriums-- in this case, against the production of nuclear arsenals. The technology to produce lots of bombs is the same technology you need to keep lights on using less useful fission feedstocks-- fuel enrichment through breeder reactors. The nuclear nonproliferation treaty effectively makes the deployment of such reactors a no-no. They are not on the menu.
Let it be a cautionary tale about why you should REAAAAAALY contemplate the consequences of widespread moratoriums against technologies.