Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 16

Author Topic: War of the Planets : Human thread : Research Q3 2025  (Read 13851 times)

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #120 on: August 26, 2015, 10:00:48 am »

Actually, why SAM. Why not just scramjet-powered AAM? Hell at that speed we can even use KE penetrators.

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #121 on: August 26, 2015, 10:09:42 am »

I offered an air to air missile without specifying how we will get the speed. It may be a scramjet or whatever else engineers will choose... But yeah, if we go for six Mach+... we don't need a heat warhead. changed description of PL-13 to kinetic penetration
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #122 on: August 26, 2015, 11:23:27 am »

Time to stop discussion and start voting. My vote goes to

PL-15
Advanced nimble Mach 6.5 (more is better)  air to air missile that comes in two variants. One is kinetic penetration type of missile and another uses more standard shrapnel proximity fuse warhead

« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 12:35:21 pm by Ukrainian Ranger »
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #123 on: August 26, 2015, 11:33:06 am »

But then doesn't this defeat the purpose of defeating drones?

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #124 on: August 26, 2015, 11:47:33 am »

Why can't it achieve a direct hit? It is harder than shrapneling it but it is doable.
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #125 on: August 26, 2015, 12:30:31 pm »

Why can't it achieve a direct hit? It is harder than shrapneling it but it is doable.
As its main purpose is to defeat drones. Forfeiting the Shrapnel variety is too much a compromise.

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #126 on: August 26, 2015, 12:35:37 pm »

OK, I agree. Edited.
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Baffler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Caveat Lector.
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #127 on: August 26, 2015, 12:45:37 pm »

PL-15
Advanced nimble Mach 6.5 (more is better)  air to air missile that comes in two variants. One is kinetic penetration type of missile and another uses more standard shrapnel proximity fuse warhead


Works for me, +1.
Logged
Quote from: Helgoland
Even if you found a suitable opening, I doubt it would prove all too satisfying. And it might leave some nasty wounds, depending on the moral high ground's geology.
Location subject to periodic change.
Baffler likes silver, walnut trees, the color green, tanzanite, and dogs for their loyalty. When possible he prefers to consume beef, iced tea, and cornbread. He absolutely detests ticks.

coleslaw35

  • Bay Watcher
  • A disgusting pile of slop.
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #128 on: August 26, 2015, 03:27:56 pm »

Time to stop discussion and start voting. My vote goes to

PL-15
Advanced nimble Mach 6.5 (more is better)  air to air missile that comes in two variants. One is kinetic penetration type of missile and another uses more standard shrapnel proximity fuse warhead


+1
Logged

TopHat

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #129 on: August 27, 2015, 05:13:29 am »

My only worry with designing a new missile now is that whatever countermeasures to the HX-1 the Invaders adopt this turn might be versatile enough to protect against the PL-15 as well, rendering it ineffective against the dropships and drastically reducing its usefulness.
Logged
I would ask why fire can burn two men to death without getting hot enough to burn a book, but then I read "INEXTINGUISHABLE RUNNING KAMIKAZE RADIOACTIVE FLAMING ZOMBIE" and realized that logic, reason, and physics are all occupied with crying in the corner right now.

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #130 on: August 27, 2015, 05:27:33 am »

This game is very different to Sensei's because new systems appear slowly. They may design some point defence drones, new better armored dropships, new small and nimble dropships and so on. But they will keep using old unescorted dropships till they are replaced or enough point defence drones is produced.
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

TopHat

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #131 on: August 27, 2015, 05:38:21 am »

That may be so, but they also have the ability to concentrate the newer designs against us and use the older dropships elsewhere (speaking of which, we should probably send a force to Brazil if we have some equipment spare). I also think you overestimate the time taken to phase in new systems, considering we already have some HX-1s operational.
Logged
I would ask why fire can burn two men to death without getting hot enough to burn a book, but then I read "INEXTINGUISHABLE RUNNING KAMIKAZE RADIOACTIVE FLAMING ZOMBIE" and realized that logic, reason, and physics are all occupied with crying in the corner right now.

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #132 on: August 27, 2015, 05:47:07 am »

Spoiler: secret strategy stuff (click to show/hide)
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #133 on: August 27, 2015, 05:50:09 am »

Spoiler: secret strategy stuff (click to show/hide)
concur.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Planets : Human thread : Design Q1 2025
« Reply #134 on: August 28, 2015, 11:14:21 am »

PL-15

The PL-15 is a missile optimized for speed, capable of reaching speeds up to Mach 7. It utilizes a reliable solid rocket engine, and active radar terminal guidance to find it's target. It has to be launched at supersonic speed, and has a limited flight time and relatively small warhead, giving it shorter range and less killing power than the conventional missile. Two warheads choices are available, kinetic and fragmentation. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 16