Everybody: which of you, if any, would be comfortable revealing your pictures if asked? I'm not asking anybody to reveal their pictures right now, mind. I'm just looking for reactions.
Not much you'd find out from the picture, and I'm almost willing to fullclaim anyway.
1. I'm not sure what it does--maybe redirects his actions to whoever he nightkills--but the point is that you got redirected to the guy who got killed while targeting NQT, which is most likely not coincidental.
2. Mafia or SK.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. SK? Any alignment guess that requires a convoluted explanation to make NQT both the killer and an active redirector to the killed is a guess best thrown away. Particularly when it leaves no scumkill.
5. It means you've either uncovered very strong evidence of NQT being mafia or SK or that you're scum who is inexplicably drawing attention to himself by saying he used an ability on the nightkilled player.
...I uncovered Very Strong Evidence by being blocked and redirected?
Anyway, if NQT/NQTteam was redirector, and NQT/NQTteam was killer,
THEN WHO WAS BLOCK? Who gains from stopping my action separately?
Looking through your extended case on NQT, it looks like you think that was also NQT's team, which leads to a question: Why? Why throw so much force at me? Why waste so many of the scum's limited resources on one guy?
And all this is built on the idea that since my target only had an 11% chance of being my target randomly (as with any other random target), and the target was significant for reasons outside of me, it must have been non-random?
Also, something suspicious I noticed with your scum list: There's a very clear contradiction between Jack's claim and your claim. Jack says somebody blocked him. You redirected him. If you're town, why would somebody block Jack? Yet, you have not addressed this once and just put him midway down the list, above your supposed "scum team".
...That's not a contradiction, and the
very first post of D2 featured a reason why I would be blocked by scum in such a case. What do you think of that reason? You seem to have completely dismissed it, but why?
Two different parties seemingly intervened to stop Jack's test, implying that he's [NQT's] allied with somebody. He seems to have an incredible reliance on theories, without making his own situational judgements.
First: How does that imply NQT's allied with somebody? Doesn't it imply two people acting separately more than anything else, what with the redundancy?
Second, yeah, NQT has that problem. He loves his beautiful theories, but sometimes lets them control his play.
-I've had my eye on Jack for a while, as well
Interesting. Why?