I do best with bullet points. But I should be able to sort it out...
- Because he wanted to lynch NQT, not scum.
- Misrepresentation of what NQT said.
- And his main reason for thinking NQT was scum was NQT's Gambit Grenade.
- First vote you placed on him was because he admitted he wasn't able to bring up any good points against NQT.
- And because he wouldn't remove his vote after he admitted that. Then he started counterattacking you.
- And he has an army of straw man arguments.
- No current reply(this is excusable, let's see what he says when he gets back).
- Finally, shotgun suspicions that have been not followed up.
Well, good sir, I think I can justify a large portion of your attack.
First up. Will you disagree with me that NQT has seemed, on and off, rather scummy over these two days? Tawarochir simply did what I did for the game, hammering attacks on NQT, but continued doing it longer than I did.
You'll notice that he's removed his vote on NQT after I justified NQT's behavior with a survivor hypothesis.
To me, his behavior against NQT is excusable considering what NQT did. However, his reaction attack against you is less excusable.
Shotgun suspicions... he's just attacking one person at a time while keeping other possibilities in mind(as I have done).
So, in summary:
His case against NQT is not scummy(in fact, his case against NQT should have been expected(a little bit)) and since has been disproved with a survivor hypothesis.
But after getting off NQT he got in a duel with you that seems a bit reactionary and defensive.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that Tawarochir is semi-scummy at this moment. Weak scum lean to me, now. Enough to merit questioning.
Tawarochir: as other people have stated, your reactionary posting and weak scum hunting are a tad bit scummy. Explain.