the battlebus introduces groundbreaking expertise in engines and treads
what else could you desire
LSP I can't get the point of introducing new design for the sake of introducing them. Namely, the fibreglass plane last turn, or the armored bus this turn.
the fiberglass plane would have brought us materials experience, sadly nobody really wanted it because fiberglass was 2dangerous4u, i'll bring it back when it's safer but that'll probably be in the late 30s considering how often we replace our planes
the designs break the paradigm, but you guys are really failing at thinking outside the box no matter how hard i push it
now we want a good personnel carrier, so there you go? carries a lot of men, carries them fast, doesn't care about puny obstacles like their landmines or roadblocks, doesn't care about anything other than a direct arty hit, even better: this bus could be the basis of our motorized infantry (not mechanized though, it's not balls to the walls enough to carry struunks)
I thought GM has punished enough people already for the lack of realism (or too-fast-into-future-ism), namely the Recoilless Guns.
And I mean, others think of Weapon A. Then you demands another specific pattern of Weapon A. You stick to your guns like shit, saying that your version A is out of the box enough. Others don't seem to listen. Shit falls upon us, not preventable by your specific pattern anyway. And you criticize others for not allowing you to try shit. It starts overs again.
Specifically, Putting all eggs into one APC isn't a good idea. We need to make them small and dirt cheap.
For now the mole will fit the bill. Use diesel. If possible make it amphibious (but abandon that once it turns out to be complicated)
Author
Topic: Arms Race, Moskurg: 1935 Production (Read 98982 times)