Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Baffler]

We'd need to get more resources to extract first, which means taking territory.

Ah, for some reason I thought improved logistics meant that we'd be able to get more resources out of the territory we already had.

+1 to fixing yellowjacket.

[Kashyyk]

I'm assuming we can't spend a revision/design action for improved mining/drilling?

[Taricus]

Ooohhh, I'd think we'd have to check actually.

[Sensei]

Model 4 Yellowjacket: A new Yellowjacket revision. The oil radiator is replaced with a more reliable water one which doesn't leak everywhere, and the exhaust is rearranged so that the exhaust pipes stick out of the bottom of the airplane, and the canopy isn't fouled with exhaust and oil.

Oh yeah, don't forget you guys have an Expense Credit and an Espionage Credit.

[Taricus]

The espionage credit I think we're already using. Now, the expense credit. Tanks anyone?

Oh yeah, did we managed to cheapen the fuel injector at all, or was that already included?

[Kashyyk]

What are we doing Espionage-wise?

Expense-wise, why not the Yellowjacket? If we're going for an air battle, lets give ourselves as much of an advantage as possible.

[Taricus]

I want to check that we know how expensive the craft is. If it's only expensive, we can just use the credit for the tanks since we'd already smack them out of the skies.

[Ukrainian Ranger]

Can spending it on tanks give us the last point of jungle? I doubt it and prefer to save expense credit for a rainy day.

If we're going for an air battle, lets give ourselves as much of an advantage as possible.

What we achieve be that? OK, we kill their airplanes this turn, so what? They will get the back next turn. It is not like we can get more land from that.

If you want to spend Expense on Yellowjacket, then do it next turn, when we will need to counter their countering of Yellowjacket

[Baffler]

The T2 breaker really is a pretty good tank for this era, the only thing really holding it back is its expense. I think we should use the expense credit on that, and try to simplify it with our next revision.

[Taricus]

That, and the fact theirs has a bigger cannon. Unless ours is capable of destroying theirs easily.

[Elfeater]

If we really really really, wanted to piss them off, we could strap a few Hippos on them, for shits and giggles. Although we shouldn't poke the hornets nest honestly. I think our Breaker manages to take out there tanks using standard AP, as I think they have a medium to long barrel gun.

[LordSlowpoke]

actually, there was a plan few years back to make a superfast struunk 2 with hippos as main armament

it might have even been last year

[Taricus]

Problem is the backblast though. Besides, the Breaker cannon could easily be adjusted for the armoured car, and has a greater range.

[Taricus]

Oh, right.

Offer up disarmed dragonflies to the civilian market (And internationally, if possible)

[Baffler]

Problem is the backblast though. Besides, the Breaker cannon could easily be adjusted for the armoured car, and has a greater range.

This is actually a decent plan for a mobile AT gun. Just take off the roof of the armored car and mount this thing + some ammo instead of the machineguns. It could double as mobile light artillery that way too, if we gave it a high firing angle. Hell, it could be a revision.