Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 166 167 [168] 169 170 ... 217

Author Topic: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1935 Production  (Read 162739 times)

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2505 on: August 17, 2015, 01:23:49 pm »

It would be the most heavily armored IFV in the world! ha ha ah.  Is that a good thing?
Ask Germans in 14 years if having the most heavily armored vehicle in the world is a good thing.
I resent that. All I did was point out that we may want a pistol which is not the worst piece of crap in the universe.
We know. The problem is, we can't really afford to do anything to it
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2506 on: August 17, 2015, 01:25:20 pm »

I4m just kidding?
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2507 on: August 17, 2015, 01:27:28 pm »

Smells of Bradley,  except much heavier due to armor. And therefore sloewer. And bigger due to crew, so slower. It will not take infantry around fast and it will be painted as target by artillery and tanks from which it cant protect itself.  It is not an IFV, it is a tank with an oversized body and an undersized gun.

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2508 on: August 17, 2015, 01:28:39 pm »

 Its a WW1 troop carrying tank.

 In other words, it carries troops in a big target slower than those troops could walk.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

VoidSlayer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2509 on: August 17, 2015, 01:29:17 pm »

Okay okay so it is more like a mobile bunker.  It would take anti tank rounds to take down.

But is that a bad thing?  It should at least get the same speed as our main tank!

I am going to keep pushing some kind of IFV, in the meantime I like all the bomber proposals.

Air based rocket systems would really be against ground targets atm due to no guidance systems.

VoidSlayer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2510 on: August 17, 2015, 01:30:48 pm »

Yeah I am just playing around with designs, everyone is set on a airplane this turn.

I just do not want another AS-MAT26-50, where it is totally vulnerable to shotguns.

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2511 on: August 17, 2015, 01:33:00 pm »

Gib BMP.
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2512 on: August 17, 2015, 01:34:15 pm »

Our AS-MAT26-50 is quite succesfull. It's just an àrtillery piece, not a tank.
Logged

VoidSlayer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2513 on: August 17, 2015, 01:55:10 pm »

Okay how about a lighter IFV?

A-31-IFV

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2514 on: August 17, 2015, 02:00:15 pm »

It needs spaced or slanted armor. Lightweight solution against their RR.
Logged

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2515 on: August 17, 2015, 02:05:55 pm »

Okay how about a lighter IFV?

A-31-IFV

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
-1, doesn't conform to naming scheme. Also, popping out of the hatch to use the autocannon? Firing ports for infantry IN FRONT (how do they even get there, considering it's going to be cluttered with driver, transmission and is going to be sloped)? No machineguns? Turbo engine with TREADS ON HYDRO-PNEUMATIC SUSPENSION, HOLY SHIT MAN THIS TANK IS SO TANK IT'S ENGINE IS A TANK! Also 10 soldiers? IMHO, we should rather go the way everyone else went and make open toppped (maybe with wire cover that can be opened when you need some more firepower and grenades (when they make them) won't get in) infantry halftrack.

It needs spaced or slanted armor. Lightweight solution against their RR.
We can tell our soldiers to ride our vehicles to protect them from RR, just like Soviets!
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2516 on: August 17, 2015, 02:12:37 pm »

Our armored cars are a way better base for an IFV. Carrying many soldiers in a lumbering mass of steel when the enemyhas tanks is an horrible idea. And it is going to be sslower than our tank because to carry soldiers it will have to be bigger

The first IFV i mean.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2517 on: August 17, 2015, 02:16:01 pm »

Anyway, my next iteration of the bomber.

Spoiler: AS-1931-HAFB (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: August 17, 2015, 04:14:39 pm by 10ebbor10 »
Logged

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2518 on: August 17, 2015, 02:37:04 pm »

I support the AS-1931-HAFB
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Production
« Reply #2519 on: August 17, 2015, 02:39:20 pm »

Anyway, my next iteration of the bomber.

Spoiler: AS-1931-HAFB (click to show/hide)
Yeah, this. Except we shouldn't push for tail autocannon too much, if we're going to lose bombload or make it complex/expensive/whatever, remove it.
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.
Pages: 1 ... 166 167 [168] 169 170 ... 217