Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Andres]

I vote against the ban on strategic bombing. Strategic bombing is giving a huge advantage to us and you want us to ban it? That is unfair. None of us have chemical weapons, radioactive weapons, or biological weapons so Moskurg stands nothing to lose. You're just whining so you can get something out of us.

I support the ban on radio decryption. My vote was missed earlier.

Glory to Arstotzka.

[Playergamer]

We aren't whining, we're trying to get something out of this treaty. Plus, bombing cities Blitz-style could definitely fit into a treaty like this.

[Kashyyk]

Blitz-bombing was what I inferred that bit of the treaty referred to.

[Andres]

But why are you trying to get something out of this treaty? We're not. Should we also try getting something out of the treaty? In that case, I propose that the usage of recoilless rifles is banned.

Glory to Arstotzka.

[Sheb]

To be fair, I don't really see the point of such a treaty, apart maybe the encryption for game reason.

[evilcherry]

You don't need them against our dive bombers, which can be hit by machineguns and autocannons.

however, more powerful AA could interdict the close air space, to which the counter is flying higher... which we can't do.

Can we bring in a Flakbus?

[Hiddenleafguy]

Minus one to the treaty, puting limits on our creativity is a good way for a game like this to begin to die.

[coleslaw35]

You don't need them against our dive bombers, which can be hit by machineguns and autocannons.

however, more powerful AA could interdict the close air space, to which the counter is flying higher... which we can't do.

Can we bring in a Flakbus?

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

[evilcherry]

Minus one to the treaty, puting limits on our creativity is a good way for a game like this to begin to die.

Seriously I think the only proposals that has any traction is what explicitly prevents unfun actions. Up until now, that means WMDs in general (as one can bring in a national effort Nuke, drop it atop the other capital, and claim victory), and the "I use a spy action to make better encryption" ruckus.

((to be fair, "You don't want this hypothetical weapon and you want to ban it, now please let us name one something (which can be very real) to ban in return" isn't constructive discussion, if this counts as discussion at all.))

[Andres]

And for some reason Moskurg thinks they're entitled to use the treaty to get an advantage over us.

[Playergamer]

And for some reason Moskurg thinks they're entitled to use the treaty to get an advantage over us.

We don't think we're entitled. We're just trying to win. Same as you guys.

[Andres]

Filthy disgusting dishonourable Moskurgs using a treaty to further their goals like dogs it's depraved.

Glory to Arstotzka.

[coleslaw35]

Filthy disgusting dishonourable Moskurgs using a treaty to further their goals like dogs it's depraved.

Glory to Arstotzka.

Chill, dude, seriously. There's a very real chance that we'll lose in the next few turns.

[Execute/Dumbo.exe]

Also I think the roleplaying is getting a little bit far there, Andres.

[coleslaw35]

Also I think the roleplaying is getting a little bit far there, Andres.

^^^