Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Sensei]

Remember you are only writing the section of the treaty that pertains to weapons, High Command has stuff like legitimate targets and prisoner treatment covered.

[LordSlowpoke]

i for one propose the following treaty

THE GREAT MOSKUNG-ARSTOTZKA TREATY OF 19XX

• arstotzka is hereby banned
• mentions of arstotzka are only permitted when referring to pre-treaty conditions
• instances of post-treaty arstotzka are to be removed immediately

this concludes the treaty

[Kot]

By the way, the Geneva Protocol or whatever is in effect now, doesn't ban using chemical weapons against not-ratifying parties. So, basically, if two not-ratifying parties use it against each other, it's nobody's business. That's right lads, nobody is going to invade us if we gas all the dirty Moskurgs.

Also, I propose that we should ban swords and other melee weaponry because that's too brutal.
FUCKING
NEW
POST
NEW
POST
NEW
POST

[Taricus]

You know that just means we can ratify it right?

[Kot]

You know that just means we can ratify it right?

They will proably don't give a shit if we ask them to let us ratify it, because we're the least-important country in the world.

[LordSlowpoke]

You know that just means we can ratify it right?

They will proably don't give a shit if we ask them to let us ratify it, because we're the least-important country in the world.

yes, you are

we'd forget about you if shooting you wasn't so fun

[Taricus]

Lichtenstein and Andorra exist, so we aren't that irrelevant

[adwarf]

I think that the treaty should impose arbitrary and absurd limitations, not sane ones that take after actual treaties. Why should we ban gas weapons—how will that make the game more interesting?

Personally, I think we should ban flying vehicles, so that we're forced to rely on high-tech catapults for transport.

I support the formation of an air vehicle ban treaty.

[Taricus]

Hahahaha. OH yeah Arstotzka, you're being invaded by ice giants.

[Kot]

I think that the treaty should impose arbitrary and absurd limitations, not sane ones that take after actual treaties. Why should we ban gas weapons—how will that make the game more interesting?

Personally, I think we should ban flying vehicles, so that we're forced to rely on high-tech catapults for transport.

I support the formation of an air vehicle ban treaty.

Ban imperial measurement system.

Also what the fuck, I didin't submit this post already, what the fuck forum...?

[andrea]

so, prisoners and targets are covered elsewhere already. what we want to ban is chemical, biological and radioactive weapons it seems.

I propose another thing: a ban on interception of enemy communications.

The reason behind it is that being able to decrypt enemy comms is such an advantage that it can't and won't be ignored. Currently we are in a state of being able to send comms that can't be decrypted by enemies. We are even. We can keep it like this for the rest of the war. So that this doesn't become a game of who has the better cypher.

[10ebbor10]

I support that.

[Taricus]

Are we still allowed to patch our radios into the enemy network for shit-talking purposes?

[Sensei]

Are we still allowed to patch our radios into the enemy network for shit-talking purposes?

For the record, there's no patching in and no networks, you just talk on their channel.

[tryrar]

I support that.

As much fun as a cypher war would be, it would quickly become pretty silly, so yeah. This won't be really realistic(since SigInt is a huge part of military doctrine), but then we won't be blowing actions all the time countering their cypher or creating a new one-unless of course Sensei would like to give us a SigInt slot(maybe used during production phase as something that's actually done during that)