As a note, people are very bad at making decisions without emotions. Inability to empathize with the people is not a very good trait in a ruler. Just pointing that out.
I think we define emotional decision-making differently, as in my opinion people are doing too much of it. That might also only come from my like of realpolitik, though. Could you elaborate and give examples?
Please don't make this a full debate; I'm still on my phone.
We use hunches, emotions, memories, all these little things tie into our decisions. There is such a thing as using emotions to make your decision without being irrational or unreasonable. Mostly, though I was talking about things like
this. Original article was
this, basically. In summary(at least of the original time I heard it), a guy with a brain tumor had it removed. When it was removed, it separated the emotional part of the brain from the decision making part of the brain. And
he couldn't choose. He'd stand in the cereal aisle for hours. He couldn't make the most basic of decisions. He had trouble with big ones, too, if I remember right, though there weren't many of them. All your memories, they're all tied into memory. Influencing which way you go, what to do. They're finding that hunches can figure out things before actual reason and logic. The subconscious. It's a thing. Gut feelings, more often than not, steer people in the right direction. Without those feelings, people have a difficult time even once they've learned it consciously. Life isn't logical. Life isn't pure reason. People are unpredictable, but there's a reason our AIs can be predicted and outmaneuvered. Pure logic is a flow-chart based on statistics. It can be played false.
Emotion-less leaders make terrible leaders. Overly emotional leaders are also terrible leaders. We aren't just one or the other. Gotta use both. Two legs, two parts. If you try to balance on one, you'll manage for a while. But eventually, you'll fall. One way. Or the other.