The rule is still there in Pathfinder though.
Here's an image of the new Lycanthrope.
I don't really care about pathfinder to be honest. Its 3.5 after it took a shot of speed, and despite some of my most fun sessions being in pathfinder, I really dislike it. Most classes are rendered obsolete very quickly, meaning half of the classes are not even viable for play if you plan on going more than level 8/9. I think pathfinder needs the right GM and the right players to really make it fun. Throw in one powergamer in a more laid back campaign, and its just not fun because every encounter is "struggle to stay alive while the powergamer obliterates everything".
I like how it has the potential to use any age of weaponry and it even has stuff for a modern campaign. I also like the hybrid classes (as useless as most of them do end up becoming) and I like some of the unique stuff they bring up, like the vigilante. But I do not like it for how unbalanced everything else is.
I can have a party in 5e with two rangers, a wizard and a cleric and it will hold up just as much as a party with a druid, a paladin, an artificer and a wizard. You never feel the need to be a class because its solely good or a certain role needs to be filled. The whole archetype thing, while I do feel that it takes away from having completely different classes (examples: Ninja is now just an archtype for monk, blackguard is literally a paladin who has taken the alternate oathbreaker archetype, warlord is now a fighter archetype, warder (I think that is what it was) is now just a mystic school, etc.) it does make every single build feel viable (except ranger before it got the update; it really needed that...).
I will play the worst game of 4E over pathfinder, because at least the variety and viability of every class makes it feel like I can be whatever I want. Do I want to be a tanky beater? Berserker or avenger with the right feats. 5E I can do the same thing too, although there isn't much out right now officially. I allow every unearthed arcana into my game unless it is specified as "BAD EXAMPLE, DON'T USE THIS" or there is an updated version of it (eberron setting had artificer as an archetype of wizard, and now it's its own class, mystic got an overhaul, etc.). Pathfinder will never have that balance because to change anything would cause an uproar in the pathfinder community. Thats the way they play.
I may not like it, but that's how they like it. Same with me how I like to play; if I want to be a 4e laser cleric then damnit, I'm going to be a laser cleric