Also to expound on this before I get my throat jumped on ._.
Tiruin: Flabort is town Sexton. What do you have to say?
A query to you: FoS has context to it. Flabort is town Sexton. You're implying a lot, or nothing, within that query present. I have hinged my suspicion on a target of extremes and regret nothing from it other than the awesomeness of this situation.
When I mention this: I mean a scenario I've pondered beforehand. Excuse the adjectives used here.
Scenario meaning: If Flabort is town, which I detailed in one of my posts back there.
Cheeetar: Given my lack of defense to myself (..because of the lack of things to defend myself from other than people accusing me due to the same parallel process of thought we had
during D3), I've to back up my notes here.
While its understandable that NQT is reasoning this out logically--I'll play the other coin in noting the subtle bias effect.
Oh the scum team has to be either Hazard-Tiruin or just two-man team (in which case it's either of the two). I learned that there are no more outside threats to the town last night, which clears you as an SK (if that was really in doubt). The thing is, we have to kill them in order of Tiruin and then Hazard. If we kill Hazard first, then I get NK'd and Tiruin and TDS will lynch you tomorrow.
Transparency.
You're in a scenario where TDS is a third-party, you're pretty much confirmed from us three, and you've a target--one out of us.
Knowing NQT, he'd be bussing his buddy because of the precariousness of this situation--as long as it hits an innocent townie--and following that 'parallel thought process back on D3', we pretty much have the easiest target being picked out.
Now shifting this perspective since it seems like I'm talking as a victim--I'd like to see how you rationalize things. From my perspective, NQT has been pretty edgy about me ever...since he replaced in as Roo. For me, that doesn't align with what a town-NQT would be--as that kind of NQT would be holistic in his mannerisms (even in the snark. The british play that card
subtle and well [totally not stereotyping :X I just love british culture and I hope this won't come across as anything offensive, or biasing]).
When I say edgy...I mean provocative. I'd at least have expected a response on my big post--but probable RL issues aside, I'm still waiting for his response.
Also
NQT still has to address me properly, instead of the brevity with voting me.
Bring it on, Sage. This clergy(wo)man would like to challenge you to a battle of wits.
Same with H4zard: I haven't the clarity on his suspicions and leads, nor on why he's being one-sided. Yea, his mode of posting makes a lot of sense to me--someone testing the waters and all, but it seems far too long for that, and a lack of fishing in between.
Meaning: I've liked how you work (and if this is your first game, kudos dude. You play well; this is OOC as a whole in parentheses), but I don't like the lacking substance behind your advances. I'm doubtful about you--you may be town, we may be facing a one-man scumteam, but there's a lack of forwardness I'd expect in a town-regular here.
So queries,
H4zard:
> What are your reads as of D3, as well as the content which back them up?
> Given that it seems you've a web of information behind your posts, could you address how you narrow down suspects as well as the backing behind each and every FoS you delivered?
> Why me, all throughout? Sure, you've positioned questions to the rest--but you've also positioned that nice blue marker over my name ever since. From experience, its a warning sign and a very subtle scumtell of someone...being too cautious. I lack the words to describe this discernment at this moment, though its a reasonable basis--I'll respond when I get them (Grr self problems). >_>