Post 1Replaced in. His later claim to have breadcrumbed having an active role points here, but if he had an active role and was goading scum into targeting him with his PASSIVE role, that's a lie. Townies don't have reason to lie. It's also his first post and "subsequent action" could refer to collecting evidence and asking questions, instead.
Post 2So first real post. Contains a vote; it's not RVS, so it's not random, and there's very little supporting evidence; his vote was more likely Cheeetar jumping on other players previously accusing eachother of not voting, thinking it was a way to appear towny. However, Birdy had already answered the question that Cheeetar asks here much earlier; this is a case of Cheeetar not paying attention, of him taking advantage of previous questions, and fielding a weak case with no evidence.
He also touches upon my pet peave of using your first question to adress everyone; his question also does not seem like a day 2 question; it's more of a begginer's mafia day 1 question; it's gathering information on when to claim, or have a fake-claim ready. It's also
supposedly breadcrumbing again, but if it is, then it's lying as well. I hate it when people lie, I think it's scummy.
Post 3Asks me for my suspects. This is fine; it's a form of scum hunting.
Accuses Birdy of having a weak question, and brings up a single quote to support his stance.
Claims to prefer a narrow focus; While that in theory falls under definition 3 of
tunneling, more often than not it falls under definition 1.
Post 4Asks, again, about the set-up; this is a backhanded aproach to accusing Birdy of having a useless role and saying he doesn't trust him.
Also he comments on how when lies and gambits make things better for town they are an exception. So what's with the gambit with breadcrumbing a fake role? He's pretty much said that doing so would be anti-town.
Post 5Fishing for a Fake Claim. More asking about the set-up instead of being helpful.
Post 6Hasn't been paying attention; as evidenced by his question about converting cults. He then tries to confuse the town by quoting the mod; the mod's post that has been used for every Supernatual Game so far. The first quote is nebulous; the second is a town role that has nothing to do with the first quote.
He asks for my case against him, since I was unclear.
Post7The same sort of dismissive defense that Cheesecake was putting forth. He dismisses my cases respectively as weak, which up until now was true; my evidence is that up until this point only CheeetarPost2 and CheeetarPost6 contain any real substance or hunting. The other 4 Cheeetar posts and the vast majority of Cheesecake posts lack substance; "Lame", but his only target so far has been Birdy, who flipped town, and... no other targets. So one valid dismissal, "lame" is fine if rude. And "Confusing". Well, what I mean by looking for a safe fake claim is at every opportunity he's been asking questions (and laying false breadcrumbs) that support almost any claim possible. He could claim Gaurd, and it would make sense. Monster hunter would make sense. Miller would make a little sense. He could support a Thief claim with his posts so far. He's trying to make it so that when he claims, it's believable, by asking questions that fish for answers that can support any fake claim, even if somebody posts to reveal that they found his alignment was scum.
He even does it in this post in his question to Meph. He asks if it's possible for a potential-town-role to be scum; this question was already answered
here. But the question was asked with the intent to prove that if his role was one on the Meph post that he previously quoted then he couldn't be scum; which is not true, as demonstrated by Meph's answer.
Post 8He claims. His claim would have been supported by Meph's answer if it were any different; he picks a role off the afformentioned list of potential town roles.
He also reveals his "breadcrumbs", and claims to have lied when laying them. He also claims a different motivation behind his miller post.
He acts confused about his night visit.
Post 9Corrects himself on what a Guard is, and votes me; after I'd voted him, and gives a weak case and speaks of a beeline. As if that isn't what he did to Birdy.
Post 10He details his case against me. It's basically a distanceing-myself-from-OSG case; he then steals Birdy's post for his own case, letting others do the work for him.
Post 11A blanket question about people being jailed. We already know one jailor is dead, and who they targeted on night 1 (Birdy), so his question is about more jailors. Possibly being ready to go back on his werebear claim.
PPE:
Post 12[/url
A clarification about killing the guy with the spear. Does support his claim, but it's after his claim and could be made up.
Summary:
Still more reactive than aggressive; The cases of aggression that he does push are on Birdy (confirmed town) and on me (confirmed town to myself). Pulls gambits and lies, as evidenced by the breadcrumb fiasco, and spends more time fishing for clues as to how the game works than reading the thread and realizing his questions were already answere; Tunnely.
Author
Topic: Supernatural 8 - Game over! Town Victory (Read 68836 times)