It's only one scumslip, and he's been defending it somewhat OKish.
flabort: What are the flaws in Cheesecake's defence that make it merely "somewhat OKish"?
Sorry I missed your question earlier, I really did mean to come back and answer it.
But which do you believe to be more likely: He misread the OP in which the only reference to a cult is the "Kills/Conversions" line in the order resolution, but which mentions Coven Witches, Scum, and third parties, or the more simple solution that he IS part of a cult?
We already know of his change of defense from "How do you know there isn't" to "I misread the OP" when more people started questioning him, and honestly the first of those is a pretty weak defense. The second is barely better. He's doing well enough that you could believe him, but it's still an innately flawed defense that relies on him having made a mistake; so it's OKish in that it's believable, but flawed.
Extend, please join me, while extensions generally go needlessly unused, there are plenty of people who aren't voting (loking at you, flabort and TDS) not seriously voting (birdy) and its 3.5 hours away from day end, so this one would be good. I also just created a tie, although I'll be around to break it if necessary.
I don't want to needlessly vote
Cheesecake when there's already a lot of pressure on him for one single slip, when there's a slim possibility that he could be telling the truth at this stage, especially given that I pointed out the thing that caused everyone to wagon on him;
I feel like I already cast a dark shadow of doom onto him, and my vote is therefor already on him; but it's not, so I can save it to vote someone else.
Teneb... is being how he always is, as far as I can see. Nothing out of the ordinary, except his changed name. So he's not suspicious enough for me to vote.
At this point I'm more suspicious of
Spruce, for the reasons that I am generally suspicious of Shakerag at this point of the game. He's hardly being serious about anything, so I asked him about pinatas to see if he'd be even less serious or more serious. But also because it was a thinly veiled threat; be more serious or you'll be my pinata. On the plus side he did speculate on the flavor in response to my question, which was more serious than most of his other responses, but he then continued to be... himself, I guess. The reason I'm not voting him is because I know my vote is wasted on him right now, and he DID give a more serious response to my not-serious question/threat, so he must have picked up on the threat and understood what I meant.
That leaves a couple people with zero-to-no activity, EPenguin and
OSG coming readily to mind.
In fact, Oragami has been even worse than spruce when it comes to being serious and answering questions straight. His two highest content posts are
here and
here: "I'm not going to base any arguments of of flavor text" and "My posts will be sparse", though up to that point they already were very sparse. There are a large number of questions directed at OSG which he hasn't answered, at least one of which are mine, and out of six posts four of them were completely shitposts.
Author
Topic: Supernatural 8 - Game over! Town Victory (Read 68812 times)