Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[zombie urist]

Generally me: why are you still asking rvs questions? Why are you fossing instead of voting?

Pearson: why didn't you want is to know you suspected him?

[Peradon]

Pearson: why didn't you want is to know you suspected him?

I'm assuming this is for me....

I didn't want him to know I suspected him. Once scum know that someone is hot on their trail, they put up more defenses around them. I wanted to get more from OSG so I could get a rock-solid case that doesn't rely on a single post of his.

[Deus Asmoth]

Do you think that your case now is rock solid? You raised three points in your vote on OSG and dismissed two of the three possibilities you raised based off very subjective arguments.

[Generally me]

Generally me: why are you still asking rvs questions? Why are you fossing instead of voting?

i don't know what fossing is and I'm really undecided on voting.

[Peradon]

Do you think that your case now is rock solid? You raised three points in your vote on OSG and dismissed two of the three possibilities you raised based off very subjective arguments.

No, it isnt and I know it. Thus why I was trying to wait until I had more to go on. But I do believe my points are valid. Do you think they are valid? If not, what invalidates them?

[origamiscienceguy]

Peradon,

do you just pick someone for RVS, or do you use Random.org?

[Generally me]

zombie urist

[Deus Asmoth]

Do you think that your case now is rock solid? You raised three points in your vote on OSG and dismissed two of the three possibilities you raised based off very subjective arguments.

No, it isnt and I know it. Thus why I was trying to wait until I had more to go on. But I do believe my points are valid. Do you think they are valid? If not, what invalidates them?

They're valid assuming that OSG is conforming to what you read his meta as being, which isn't close to being guaranteed. I dislike arguments based purely on meta, particularly this one, since you're assuming that OSG isn't trying to pull a gambit simply because he hasn't done so yet.

[Teneb]

I'm working on a text that needs to be delivered monday right now, so while I am keeping up with how the game is going, it's a bit hard to find time to get a post out. Thankfully it's a weekend. Still, the quote below caught my attention enough that I feel the need to comment on it.

zombie urist

You going to back that vote up with any argument? What did ZU do (or fail to do) to deserve that vote? Why do you think he should be lynched? Present a case.

[Generally me]

Well I rolled to see who I should vote for because everyone seems pretty non cultist to me.

I really don't get how you can make any kind of case against someone the first round. It just guessing and grasping onto tiny things that shouldn't matter.

[origamiscienceguy]

Well I rolled to see who I should vote for because everyone seems pretty non cultist to me.

I really don't get how you can make any kind of case against someone the first round. It just guessing and grasping onto tiny things that shouldn't matter.

As I was just saying with Peradon, the first day is not abut randomly lynching someone. The random votes are usually accompanied with a question to force a conversation to start. For example:

Unvote

Generally me, so far, what do you think are the biggest, and most important differences between forum mafia and traditional mafia? What are you doing to adapt to these discrepancies?

[Generally me]

Generally me, so far, what do you think are the biggest, and most important differences between forum mafia and traditional mafia? What are you doing to adapt to these discrepancies?

The fact you can't read people's faces and how they talk, only what they type.

Ask people questions and do something after that. I'll read through everything again.

[Peradon]

Peradon,

do you just pick someone for RVS, or do you use Random.org?

I usually pick someone. The reason I picked Teneb was to see what reaction I would get.

They're valid assuming that OSG is conforming to what you read his meta as being, which isn't close to being guaranteed. I dislike arguments based purely on meta, particularly this one, since you're assuming that OSG isn't trying to pull a gambit simply because he hasn't done so yet.

Well, why dont we just ask him?

OSG: Were you playing some kind of gambit when you voted for me?

[origamiscienceguy]

Peradon,

do you just pick someone for RVS, or do you use Random.org?

I usually pick someone. The reason I picked Teneb was to see what reaction I would get.

They're valid assuming that OSG is conforming to what you read his meta as being, which isn't close to being guaranteed. I dislike arguments based purely on meta, particularly this one, since you're assuming that OSG isn't trying to pull a gambit simply because he hasn't done so yet.

Well, why dont we just ask him?

OSG: Were you playing some kind of gambit when you voted for me?

No, I was not. The fact that you voted the only person who had a vote makes you slightly suspicious to me. My vote on you was RVS to get you to talk.

[Peradon]

So you are saying that the vote you put on me was in no way serious?

Peradon: you give no reason or question along with this vote, and you also voted someone that already had a vote on them. Why?

That sure sounds like a serious vote to me.