. . . >.>
Sometimes, my words fail me in making an introduction or making a dialogue-post, but generally they came along the question of 'how do I explain this idea to others, and how can they see..what and where I see it'?
(Also English is currently bad at the moment. Please forgive...err, misspellings. And grammar.)
Communication. To those in relationships, its sometimes hard to convey the same idea and emotion when perception differences exist--one thing may, in a point to the other, be totally perceived differently, and the manner by which one can convey the idea to the other is...lost in translation, due to the sensation in itself being very different than the 'norm'.
Advice sans stress--education would help a TON. Talking to people working in these fields, or others with experience in the same feelings also help. For referencial purposes,
here's a video link on differences(?). The basepoint is not judging--and the other base point being that there are many ways to communicate, and it is to the boundaries of imagination to poke at how to communicate. (
link mentioned above continued here). Point is: Whatever happens--its a diagnosis. Its a diagnosis, and in no way does this inhibit you, truly. It's just being different. Nothing bad in being different.
By that, I mean that while the diagnosis may seem fully encompassing you? There's a lot more on ya which emphasizes the innate potential everyone has.
This...is also part of what I meant by the 'judging others' thing earlier in a post. :/ There's a conventional method of communication that we usually miss, because we've skimmed or concluded a 'portion' -- that upon looking back, realize that that portion is actually something, really, expressively, important.
For example, 'I ask something, {and I don't see a requisite response [ie Nods//Body language]}, so I'll take that as a yes?'. Sometimes its misunderstanding: people are pretty normal in thoughts, but it doesn't...come off correctly, sometimes.
I think I'm going off a tangent here. :/
Anyway, secondary point is around communication.
Another referencial video << This one pertaining to brain damage (belaying any assumption put here, I'm not inferring this to MC//OP or anything. -_-)), wherein the story goes that, despite the damage to a cognitive portion of the brain affecting areas of perception, there are alternative methods which tell you that 'there's no dead end' when facing a problem or circumstancial worry.
...Hopefully my point isn't lost somewhere in between up here.
I may be reflecting or projecting a bit on the...uhh, the
on the stigma carried against psychological cases a bit in my tone above. I think. Like when looking at schizophrenia--it has become a somewhat 'slang' term, I believe, in the west (schizo?), used to describe anyone looking or being "crazy", despite the diagnosis in itself not pointing to crazy.
A lot of misunderstanding.
And its really annoying me that way that this misunderstanding still prevails in certain areas (not implying anything towards anyone, just...ranting(?) here?). ._.