Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16

Author Topic: Gender stuff - Let's try this again  (Read 16580 times)

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #210 on: March 19, 2015, 08:24:57 pm »

Not arguing on 'why this thread exists' or the purpose and motivation, silly. :P Just giving a note here, that its very unclear. This vague clarity creates misunderstandings, and misunderstandings are pretty much a foundation of many problems...which the rules are supposed to prevent: problems.
Logged

That Wolf

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yes, that Wolf
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #211 on: March 19, 2015, 08:29:36 pm »

I agree with Tiruin.
You seem to let some quoting slide but others offend you.
Thats 'why'

The rules have a few loop holes in them.
Logged
I am not afraid of an army of Warriors led by a Child; I am afraid of an army of Children led by a Warrior.

Tack

  • Bay Watcher
  • Giving nothing to a community who gave me so much.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #212 on: March 19, 2015, 08:49:06 pm »

Quoting is pretty ingrained into this forum culture, after all- so I'm not entirely sure how well we do in a situation where it's forbidden- social experiment


So when I first came into the gender threads, I was tentatively expressing my personal, "far-right left wing views". Coming here I can see that it's opened up the discussion to both sides of the table thankfully, rather than one side be cowed by social pressure- but after skimming through the last however-many 50-post-pages, It's getting pretty noticeable that the Other side is beginning to be downtrodden.
This forum is primarily left-wing and I've noticed that whilst Vector continues to fight the good fight, Alleecat has seriously lagged under the pressure. Sure, the "you have no right to speak on something you haven't experienced" tag is harsh, but in specific circumstances that's true, especially with LB's constant regurgitation of "fighting words".

But everyone gets the right to ask and share.

The basic idea of what this kind of discussion should achieve is Learning. Those who don't know ask, and those who do know answer. I think most people here (after the distinctions between sex and gender) are on similar sides- really the crux point comes down to a single thing- rights.

Do we think that a minority should have less rights because they take up less of a population share than everyone else?
Do we think that a disability entitles someone to More rights than a person without? If those rights are necessary for them to function in society?
DO WE see non-polar gender, gender confusion, and dis... Whatever; as a disability?
Disability is loosely defined as someone who has a physical or mental handicap which inhibits their actions.
What about social handicaps? The majority has railroaded the genders- not as an act of oppression but in passive, herd movements.
How much extra effort Should the majority give to make the minority live an easier life?
Should it be relative?
How Much Is One Life Worth?

These aren't rhetorical questions, and I'm not gonna say "there's no wrong answers".
As a counterpoint, there is a Lot of right ones, sometimes mutually exclusive.

I've said before, Ethics is not one thing. It's not. It's insanely complicated.
We're an incredibly strange breed of animal which operates as a herd but still is loathe to give up anything for the greater good.

I don't know what point I had, I started writing this an hour ago, but I hope I made it.
Feel free to quote me.
Logged
Sentience, Endurance, and Thumbs: The Trifector of a Superpredator.
Yeah, he's a banned spammer. Normally we'd delete this thread too, but people were having too much fun with it by the time we got here.

Urist McScoopbeard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damnit Scoopz!
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #213 on: March 20, 2015, 08:41:13 am »

Tack, I have never met anyone with more confusing viewpoints.

EDIT: Which is to say, could you please clarify them? I mean, half of the time you seem very "left-wing", to use your wording, and the other half of the time you seem "right-wing".

EDIT: Damnit, I might as well reply to them.

Everyone gets equal rights, specifically in equal of opportunity situations, not opportunity of outcome.

Disabilities generally make life harder, and while society tends not to impart more rights on a disabled individual, it does do what it can to ease their burden.

No. Fucking Christ man. Non-polar gender is not a disability. If you went up to a person who had  sex change and told them they were disabled you are liable to be beaten up. To take it further, if a teenager, say, is female and identifies as a male it is expressly not ok to categorize them at disabled physically or mentally.

Indeed, that is how disability is defined. So how could it be applied to trasngenders?

There are definitely social handicaps. Although, America is starting to get a little more accepting. It's a little slow from the legal standpoint.

Not that much.

No.

Depends on the life, especially if you're going to cast that one life in to the limelight and highly publicize it.

In order of appearance.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2015, 08:52:31 am by Urist McScoopbeard »
Logged
This conversation is getting disturbing fast, disturbingly erotic.

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #214 on: March 20, 2015, 08:43:56 am »

.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 05:27:26 pm by penguinofhonor »
Logged

Urist McScoopbeard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damnit Scoopz!
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #215 on: March 20, 2015, 08:54:29 am »

Yeah, Tack. Pick a side. You're either with us or against us.

I hardly care which SIDE he takes. However, some of his point seem contradictory. Although I get the feeling he's mostly very right wing and just hasn't expressed it in full. (Don't take that the wrong way, it seems to be what you're hinting at!)
Logged
This conversation is getting disturbing fast, disturbingly erotic.

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #216 on: March 20, 2015, 08:58:57 am »

.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 05:27:31 pm by penguinofhonor »
Logged

Tack

  • Bay Watcher
  • Giving nothing to a community who gave me so much.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #217 on: March 20, 2015, 10:42:57 am »

I've stated myself as conservative left-wing many times. On a left-left forum like this it can come out pretty right-wing, but in terms of society in general I wouldn't see myself that way.
But quantifying politics like that is also a problem, I guess. Who knows.

Looking back on it objectively, I just seem to be backing the underdog.
Logged
Sentience, Endurance, and Thumbs: The Trifector of a Superpredator.
Yeah, he's a banned spammer. Normally we'd delete this thread too, but people were having too much fun with it by the time we got here.

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #218 on: March 20, 2015, 03:44:57 pm »

.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2017, 08:11:04 pm by Vector »
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #219 on: March 20, 2015, 07:17:32 pm »

Re: gender roles

So, some people assume roles are rules rather than guidelines, therefore the guidelines must be scrapped? I don't really follow the logic here.
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

TD1

  • Bay Watcher
  • Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #220 on: March 20, 2015, 07:27:53 pm »

The above.

Feminists scaring children in Berlin by setting things on fire and running riot over a barby house is rather stupid. If they wanted true equal rights ( in which girls can go to a barby house if they want) they would not do that.
Logged
Life before death, strength before weakness, journey before destination
  TD1 has claimed the title of Penblessed the Endless Fountain of Epics!
Sigtext!
Poetry Thread

Bauglir

  • Bay Watcher
  • Let us make Good
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #221 on: March 20, 2015, 07:39:50 pm »

I might be bending the rules here, but I said something relevant to this very red herring just last page.

I certainly don't want to deny to a trans woman the option of wearing dresses in order to feel more feminine. The difference in the latter case is that the notion is intimately tied to what she understands to be womanly, instead of what she's told is, and her choices are motivated by her own agency. Moreover, the whole business lacks larger implications for everybody else; there's no need to object to her notion of femininity because it conflicts with your own, for example.

At least, that's my take on it.

Incidentally, I want to ask - have I actually been helping anybody here? I think I've been advocating strongly on the side of trans people to be allowed to be who they understand themselves to be, but I'm starting to wonder if that's what I'm managing to communicate. If there's some way I could do a better job of that, I would love to hear it. Cause if I'm messing up, I should fix it!
Logged
In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6.
“What are you doing?”, asked Minsky. “I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe” Sussman replied. “Why is the net wired randomly?”, asked Minsky. “I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play”, Sussman said.
Minsky then shut his eyes. “Why do you close your eyes?”, Sussman asked his teacher.
“So that the room will be empty.”
At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.

SirQuiamus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Keine Experimente!
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #222 on: March 20, 2015, 07:45:35 pm »

^^^
The distinction between rules and guidelines is only applicable when it's convenient. Guidelines are interpreted as inviolable rules within social groups, and "ought" becomes "must" whenever there's some serious gender-policing to be done.
Logged

Tack

  • Bay Watcher
  • Giving nothing to a community who gave me so much.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #223 on: March 21, 2015, 12:15:41 am »

Barbie house.
Barbies have always been a symbol of unrealistic expectations of femininity, so feminists use them as a strawman for the patriarchy.

That being said, Ken gives off some unrealistic expectations too, and men don't seem to complain (Even though at least he's far more proportionally correct)
Logged
Sentience, Endurance, and Thumbs: The Trifector of a Superpredator.
Yeah, he's a banned spammer. Normally we'd delete this thread too, but people were having too much fun with it by the time we got here.

AlleeCat

  • Bay Watcher
  • Black, the beast, descends from shadows...
    • View Profile
Re: Gender stuff - Let's try this again
« Reply #224 on: March 21, 2015, 01:30:41 am »

Gender roles are treated as a bad thing largely because not everybody fits neatly into their assigned box.
"not everybody" meaning "nobody." I'm pretty sure nobody in the world actually completely fits their gender stereotype (and feels comfortable doing so)
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16