ummmm tldr deathsword Is that fine mod? Dw about answering it I will see in the updated vc whenever that happens.
Pardon me friend but it might be better if you quoted what you're responding to Darksword about. That is how you vote by the way. In the future I suggest being a bit more... Concise. You didn't ask anything but only really made a test post. Which is fine. We've all done it. Just don't makea habit of it.
Hmmmm I was not expecting this response; from a townie mindset; [...] If I have no case why do you feel the need to want to defend yourself? [...]. But for clarification my read has nothing to do with information at all it's mostly a gut read from your first post.
This is a poor thing to say. People defend themselves against poor logic because sometimes a mob mentality comes up. In defending themselves they are analysing a poor case and will use the information gathered from the resulting back and forth to determine whether or not their accuser is mafia or just has a poor case for some reason.
non-threatening is not a scum tell on its own. Attempting to be non-threatening should raise alarms for everyone. Who is trying to subvert mislead and destroy us? Mafia. How do they achieve this? Are they gonna manipulate us with their scintillating wit? I think not. How mafia [...] post in game is just as important as how they want those posts to come across. It is logical for mafia to act in a manner not to arouse suspiciousn.
At the point you accuse him of buddying he has posted three or so times. Each one was asking questions of each person in turn. Legitimate thoughtful questions for the most part. I got no vibe that he was trying to be non-threatening. You, on the other hand, are being overly aggressive for some unknown reason. Your logic is faulty mate. I suggest calming down a bit and trying to build a proper case based on what Hector has actually done.
I am concerned with peradon? [...] He says he is not confused and yet asked me about why I thought non-threatening would be a scum tell. He also says he is not defending Hector. Well I believe him that he is not confused so his question would serve the purpose of attempting to only discredit the information I would provide. Not certain about the defending Hector part. He voted me because he is "investigating" my thought process.
As he should. He sees flaws in your logic. Thus he is acting town if he investigates that.
If you notice I have not answered any questions (on purpose) put forth that would be a great reason to vote me, I suspect, in this game. And was obtuse by simply charging forward and demanding that Hector be voted. I mean I would pointed it out that they were trying for an easily lynch and just blatantly vote them back.
You are still being obtuse. I have no idea what your point is. But here's a protip:
Never admit that you are avoiding answering questions. As town it paints you in a negative light. As Scum it draws attention.What does that even mean investigate my thought process I assume that is something that happens a lot here. I encourage you to not ever say that again peradon. If you think I am acting scummy why not say so? why do you want to be hide what you are thinking?
It means he is attempting to understand your logic. He's not hiding what he is thinking. In fact, you are. You have admitted to it. [see above quote].
I DECLARE US OUT OF RVS. You guys can go ahead and stop with the questions as their is already things to analyze.
You don't get to make that call. I'm assuming you're joking around and trying to be funny. I suggest you take it a bit more seriously. Fun is fine. Clownshoes is not.