:v What I believe LD means by that is that there are large consequences to the disjointed familial structures being promoted today in western society. Keep in mind before reading this that, IMHO, adoption is a trend that is very much in contrast to this, and thus should prob be encouraged.
Aye
Half the families being broken up, the other half being dysfunctional, both producing children more prone to developmental problems I listed out in the wall of text, because seriously the list of problems it causes is a wall of text
This shit is absolutely haramEnjoy the huge, prob sort of disjointed and full of typoes and spelling mistakes text wall of social doom...
...You have, essentialy, ceased to exist.
No that's just the political consequences and I disagree with some of your assessments, especially given how with the old dependent relying upon the few young and dysfunctional, they will actually be bereft of money and will be inheriting debt, not assets
Also I find it laughable whether someone who doesn't care about raising their kids will give a shit about having grandkids to keep on their legacy. Plenty of old folks in London without grandkids just find some intern to be their surrogate proteges and they get on by, plenty of ways to shirk responsibility and still get all the biological kicks. Likewise there's no point even talking about customs or traditions as whatever customs or traditions there were died with the parents, not the children, and there is nothing for them to learn from their parents even if their parents understood that parenting decided their child's development and was not a hard task to be avoided in favour of gratification. Family names come and go, at some point they'll be extinguished, so just raise your kids for your kids sakes you know?
To avoid losing track of things I'm just gonna maintain my original point, raising children is fundamental to pretty much every facet of their character and future prospects. Family structure is important, and dysfunctional families fuck up children. If you'd prefer pleasure seeking over hard work then go for it, but don't bring kids into the mix, don't pretend your parental neglect has no effect on your kids and don't expect to seek approval for it as anything but YOLO sweg :
P
That's a you plural by the way, not you accusative, as the English language has no way of clearly stating you plural
Frankly if you don't believe in religious afterlife there is nothing stopping you from drinking your fill for as long as you live, shirking all of your cares towards your children and dying in blissful pleasure whilst your children live with your consequences, you existing with or without a legacy will stop mattering to you because you won't exist. This is simply a matter of whether you believe you have any responsibility whatsoever towards hard work for your kids, the science supports it, the sociology supports it, the stats supports it, the religion supports it, the family would support it if it had not been replaced with a model for consumerism e.t.c.
Oh yeah, and that whole thing of would you rather spend your life gaining material baubles, dying commercially successful and childless, or substituting expenses for parenting? Naaaaaaaaaah, shit is
haramNow, I'm not saying there's anything terribly morally wrong with any of this (after all this is one of the ways society changes, and change is good in the long run, maybe?)
Change is a process, good change and bad change is more relevant
but this has been going on for quite a while now, and any old timey people who lives in france/germany/italy/england has prob noticed that the world they knew just kinda went mostly poof in the last 2 generations.
Hahahaha well they can get sour all they want, it's the future they chose
Num nums
Poll
71 (27.7%)
Author
Topic: Railgun and Spirituality Discussion (Read 681418 times)