What I'm saying, Fenrir (and I should say here that I have no idea what ID advocates are) is that from what I can tell, your objection is: 'technically it can't work like that since if something knows everything then it can't have uncertainty or planning'.
Which, to me, is missing the point. Intelligent design also means 'well-crafted', in reference to systems specifically. Argument based on 'timeless, thus it can't/doesn't need to plan, thus it can't design, thus your system is false' is missing a step in the logic chain. Something being made in a way such that it accomplishes the purposes you desired for it to is an example of intelligent design. Whether or not it's being thought of in the same way we think about things is beside the point. You specifically said it 'implies' that. You did not say it is defined as that. My point here is that implications are not arguments. They're implications. 'Intelligent' in this context means it was not random, nor was it defined by an interminable process. Choosing how to define a word and then telling someone that their shorthand name for a set of ideas and theories doesn't fit when using that definition is not actually accomplishing anything.
If someone says something that doesn't make sense, the first step is not to assume they're wrong. The first step is to assume you misunderstood them. Principle of Charity. If you ask for clarification and it still doesn't make sense, then maybe you can assume they're wrong. But 'well that sounds stupid, so the idea itself must also be stupid' is not the proper way to go about debating.
Another way to look at it would be that human rationality is aspiring towards the perfect Rationality of God, which would make it perfectly sensible to compare man-made objects to natural ones. We don't have perfect information, but we try to have good information. It doesn't prove anything, mind you, just an interesting thought.
SIDENOTE: Bohandas, don't you dare. Don't you dare cross those streams. This is already pressurized oil. We don't need to have napalm thrown on. You want to make that comparison, do it in a thread about social justice. Please.