Sorry guys, I was really busy the last few days. Let’s do some work now.
Nerjin: You have absolutely no opinion on anyone? This seems unlikely. We may be D1, but we do have some info out there already.
I have many opinions. Just not any that are relevant at the moment.
Long list of suspects
So you believe that everyone is possibly scum? That’s very interesting. But not overly helpful. I’d suggest that you start pursuing cases on your top three suspects.
Nerjin & mastahcheese: Could you guys show up and start scumhunting, please?
No... But seriously, I apologize for lack of content the last few days as I have been busy.
Please contribute a little more to the game. I know that I have gone on record saying that you shouldn’t post overly long things but you’re posting just enough to achieve the active-lurker status. We need more than just single-sentence answers.
I’m going to go ahead and state that currently Peredon and Zormod are my current scum picks of day 1. The latter because he is active-lurking so hard you’d need a stick of dynamite to get through it.
Peredon for a few reasons. He claims that he viewed Deni as a slight scum read [as are all his reads really it seems] but the second the person he felt was most scum said something he flipped Deni right to the bottom of the list. Seemed a bit quick to me.
There was also the Hector/Peredon interaction that did strike me as a little “Good job
scum-pal! Which of the
town possible scum should we go after?”
It is for that reason that I will ask this:
Peredon why is it that you instantly flipped on Deni after your most suspected player stated one little fact? Zormod hasn’t participated much and you’ve stated yourself that he’s lurking pretty hard.
I also want to address the following outside of a spoiler. Unfortunately others have already weighed in on it but I’m going to go over it AGAIN because I wrote up this thing early and want to drill it into your new player minds.
Because, to get an emotional reaction out of them, I would have to convince them that I am convinced about them. And I can't do that without enough evidence.
Towards the end of the day, I will either vote for the person who acted the scummiest, and if nobody seems scummy enough, i'll just vote no lynch. In fact, until I see someone acting very scummy, I'll just vote No Lynch/cook
NO NO NO NO NO! NO! Stop! STOPIT! That is the WORST possible thing you can do. If you DON'T lynch then town gets absolutely no information. I always have to explain this.
Look at it this way: What do we learn if someone is lynched? Their alignment and who voted them. Then someone else dies and we know THEIR alignment. 2 alignments, several cases to examine.
What do we get if we no-lynch? One alignment and no cases to examine because we don't really know much. Just that one guy died and that any cases from yesterday might be valid still.
You should NEVER no-lynch in my opinion UNLESS you're taking the game from MYLO to LYLO. The reason there being that you eliminate one of the wrong answers.