Uh, what? What is there to question about that post? And yes, I am wrong about the orange part, because I still can't find the post where you actually claimed your result on Zombie Urist.
...So
even after probably several
instances of claims of that matter, unquestioned by you...or perhaps even a search function "Protect"...did not reveal
this?
...Really?
You confuse me with your perception. It's astute at times, and then here's now ._.
Yes, of course I'm going to believe the person who I believe to be scum when they say they would have killed someone completely different if they were scum. Furthermore, your argument is completely stupid. If you killed Scripten last night, we would have known ZU was scum because only by him blocking Scripten would you have succeeded in killing him (assuming DA is not scum). Why would scum kill a war vet as he is no danger to you in anyway after he claims.
Yeaaaah, its totally "stupid" because an
assumption validates its purpose and theory. That's a very good idea--especially considering the player count as of the moment.
PS: Town can fakeclaim here; the orthodox policies on town and claims do not necessarily apply in Paranormal/Supernaturals when there are needed secrets to be gained or protected. So that's another factor into the equation.
I don't understand what you are trying to say here.
I was questioning your 'scumteam' proposition. With a blank vote and nothing for me to answer--it seems you are ultimately conclusive with that 'speculation' list. You did not leave any space for questioning, but propositioned the ideas instead.
Because Zombie Urist can roleblock people and I still need to figure out the third person on the scumteam. You're also scummier than anyone else. You picking DA as a target is completely stupid because until today DA was NOT a suspect by anyone, even you. You yourself said that DA and pisskop were likely the same alignment.
Its nice to see counter-transference in play, as well as run-on correlation sentences.
Somehow, you're not backing such an impactful and evocative statement in any of your posts on me.
Of note, the blue part--I said that BACK IN THE DAY, but I changed that later on to see Pisskop as Town, but DA as uncertain.
Would you cast aside the guise and label of 'stupid' to understand that one could act on a target they deem as 'non-suspect'? Non-suspect =/= Town, scumbag.
You imply a lot, kuya.
I've never said anything there, other than...from how you take it.
And here I was thinking you voted me because you thought I was scum and were withholding your reasons to make a point about how I shouldn't withhold reasons or whatever.
...That's the power of why I withhold votes (as said earlier this game). People imply things. >_>
And no--I'm uncertain to y'all. The list of reads I positioned earlier show a general degree of suspicion, altogether non-arbitrary, but non-ordinal either.
Why are you voting me then? You could've just asked me that stuff. I don't dodge questions.
I think you mean *were.
...I think your laziness is kicking in, to notice where my vote is placed. Me voting you poked on what I saw as really scummy back then.
The what?
I have no idea what you mean by the efficiency of the scumteam.
...Your scumpicks are implied to be lazy and non-commital, judging by the context they were worded in.
I think it's Toaster, Tiruin, and Deus Asmoth.
The last time Toaster did anything was on Day 2. Neither Tiruin's or Deus Asmoth's actions make sense and I don't really buy Deus Asmoth's explanation for his change of opinion about Tiruin.
[...]
So? If they're PMing each other they're probably not both scum, because that's just redundant.
They're not conjoined at the hip so I don't have to question them like they are. At the end of the day they still have different reads, night actions, reasoning, justifications, etc., and I didn't see a problem with Persus13's so I didn't ask him anything.
...Yes. They're probably not both scum (and I doubt anyone would just FakePM each other, or just say they PM'd each other, though its a considerable move in this game on scum-team individuals as an excuse to 'know' what the other side talks about and all)
But my point was, that you made a scumteam out of DA/me and Toaster--with Persus13 being a very valid influence on DA: You have not thrown a question towards that person connected to your suspect, so I find that...questionable.
That's very generous of you to give a player a completely free pass at lylo. Suspiciously generous.
I am not remotely okay with this.
In respect to RL conditions?
The only bit I noted as scummy in him was his post with his vote on me.
Why I didn't ask is due to noticeable differences:
That one scummy bit in question, where I saw as a jump on 'most easily perceived person as scum'; it doesn't help that I'm referring to myself back then. ...And that saying I've nothing to contribute to the discussion too. That hurts a bit, as an aside ._.
He had a note near D3 end but...He wasn't there to shift his vote or otherwise even speak.
Though I believe my wording was messy--I did not give him a free pass,
per se, but...I judged from my notes on him (which...evidently say the same general gist), though it did take in how his attitude and play was for the whole game, and in his activity level--he has asked quite a lot of pertinent and pointedly clarifying questions, as well as addressing people questioning him.
But back to the pertinent question: Why did you not use your power? Yes, its understandable that it would be a choice to 'catch me in my fakeclaim' under the situation where I am assumed to do the kill, but how did that situation
overcome pretty much anything else in considering the nightly plan or...basically how you saw it?