Unvote Pisskop, vote Deathsword;
Could you summarize the salient points of all your reads? Links are hard to follow and they don't express your point very well.
Pisskop: It doesn't appear that he's paying attention to the thread, by skimming, and he's not holding up his promises. He's also acting somewhat dodgy and unsure, but he's improving since Thursday night.
Shakerag: Active lurking, not taking the game seriously. He has
one post where he actually does some scum hunting.
TheDarkStar: Low activity, active lurking, bandwagoning, tunneling
Deathsword: Same as TDS but even less activity/content
Toonyman: Despite low post count, he actually manages to push a lot of content in his posts, and focuses on multiple people. His fixation with messing with cheese is odd.
UXLZ: High activity and although individual posts are low in content, usually, he/she has a lot to say and not much of it seems suspicious.
Flabort
((although This post is a point in his favor))
Why? The thing that sticks out to me on there is him saying you're not a good lynch.
How big a metric is post volume in your scum ratings?
Why not "gain some standing with the town" by hunting scum?
The thing that sticks out to me is that unlike his other posts this one is not a goddamn joke, and he's actually addressing multiple people and being serious in that post.
Post volume and post surface area are both medium-large metrics in my ratings. If someone has more posts or larger posts than someone else, then there SHOULD be more scummy things in the person with more/larger posts if both players are equally scummy. Therefor, if I can find only a similar amount of scummyness between the two players, then the one with more posts has a smaller scum:content ratio.
Surface area: # of posts, variable A
Volume: Size of posts, variable V
Amount of perceived scumminess: Variable S
RealScumminess= S/((A/V)+(V/A))
Author
Topic: Paranormal 24 - Game over! Doppelganger Victory! (Read 218605 times)