Hey man, you know the saying.*"If you content yourself with crumbs, you will never grasp steak." *That I just made up.
I've spent life content with rice and breadcrumbs and I've still had a few steaks in my life, I don't understand this saying
It's not particularly even a prize worth being discontent over
In addition, being discontent does not help you grasp steak. If you are on a diet of crumbs and hunger for steak, the one who is discontent for it will be controlled by their hunger whilst the one who can think about the process of gaining steak will not be addled by hunger
Paradoxically the one who hungers for the steak is less likely to attain steak at a cost that is worth it. In this same manner those who shop on hungry stomachs will not find their future meals to be as wholesome and valuable as those who shop on full stomachs and focused minds
I just hope that Sanders supporters see this and don't give Trump their votes. I do know people who were considering that. Trump actually had a lot to win in the general election by doing this, but he knew he couldn't win those votes in a fair fight. So he's hoping to get them by default.
But by entering this fight, if he won he'd make Hillary stronger and if he lost he'd make himself weaker, and if this was equal then he'd lose and Bernie rise up top, that doesn't sound like picking a fair fight - especially since the Sanders strategy is to use Trump as a platform to attack Hillary in California, this fight isn't even one where the contender would be present ;
D
I totally understand writing in Sanders, or Tzeentch, or a real third-party option...
Maybe I'm overstating this, it's just that I really like Sanders and I hate that we won't get to see him and Trump debate ):
It could still happen for reals when the situation changes. Prolly best bets are for a 3 way debate between Don-Bern-Hill on a level playing field
Plus you're not factoring in the power of the HYPE train. HYPE cannot be derailed easily