... that you are projecting things onto me that I am in no way saying or coming remotely close to saying.
Did you mean something else by this?
The measure of the compassion of a society is whether they help people, not whether they win style points while not helping people.
Or was your 500,000 in reference to Germany's refugees? In either case do not bother assuming there are any personal accusations on you, I do not care for that - this is my point:
No heads of states went on television to be applauded by the world to do the right thing as Merkel did. They just did it.
No power grabs were made under the crisis as Germany did with Frontex and no one sabotaged the borders of other countries as Merkel did irregardless of their own wishes, and with less money more were helped with no publicity. Compassion is not measured by PR.
What exactly are you accusing Merkel of failing to do? I ask because so far I haven't heard anything that wasn't intentional and driven by her core beliefs.
I would say being intentionally inept or accidentally inept makes no difference, she had no mechanisms to distinguish between asylum seekers, refugees, migrants and militants, was struggling to cope with 60,000 a year and had capacity for at most 500,000 a year and ended up with 1.8 million a year and rising, forced poorer nations into submitting to her policies - When you so ill prepared for what you have started that you have to begin confiscating the possessions of asylum seekers in order to try and pay for everything, you have failed to prevent and you have failed to accommodate this happening. The NYE attacks for example, were an egregious failure.