Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Flying Dice]

If nobody made a big deal about Bush Jr. doing coke while in service, nobody should do the same for Rubio drinking a beer in a park.

[mainiac]

[Bohandas]

I just learned that Ted Cruz was actually born in Canada. With any luck that means he's not actually eligible for the presidency. That would be a big relief because he's the worst of them all.

[mainiac]

Could be worse, he could be Gilmore.

[Rolan7]

I just learned that Ted Cruz was actually born in Canada. With any luck that means he's not actually eligible for the presidency. That would be a big relief because he's the worst of them all.

That was sorta a thing in the latest republican debate, with Trump basically saying "I'm not saying you're ineligible, just, if I were you, I would look into that lol".

Also kinda ironically, based on the rules Cruz is using, I think I heard Obama would have been eligible even if he *hadn't* been born on US soil.

[PTTG??]

The amazing thing is that the three people in the united states most likely to be president in the united states are Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Ted Cruz.

The fact that THESE are apparently the most qualified people out of 300 million is the most damning thing about the united states bar none. Either the US is full of idiots or the system is irrecoverably broken. Probably both.

[Bouchart]

Hillary will drop out either due to criminal indictment or health problems.  It'll probably be Trump vs Biden.

[FearfulJesuit]

Trump makes a brave stand against RINO SJW cucks.

[mainiac]

Hillary will drop out either due to criminal indictment or health problems.  It'll probably be Trump vs Biden.

I will be you money that does not happen.

[smjjames]

Hillary will drop out either due to criminal indictment or health problems.  It'll probably be Trump vs Biden.

Where even did you get the idea that she has health problems?

[Spehss _]

Trump makes a brave stand against RINO SJW cucks.

If it's politically incorrect or "wrong" to respond to someone because they sport clear support for politically incorrect things like white nationalism or nazis or racism or fascism, is the alternative to not respond to them, ignore them completely, and basically pretend they don't exist? That sounds like a kind of censorship, ignoring someone because they don't have the "correct" opinions or beliefs held by the majority.

[Egan_BW]

The amazing thing is that the three people in the united states most likely to be president in the united states are Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Ted Cruz.

The fact that THESE are apparently the most qualified people out of 300 million is the most damning thing about the united states bar none. Either the US is full of idiots or the system is irrecoverably broken. Probably both.

Nope, those are literally the most qualified people in the US. These people would mess up the country, like, 1000 times less than anyone I know in person.
What, are you saying that people are more competent in other places?

[smjjames]

The amazing thing is that the three people in the united states most likely to be president in the united states are Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Ted Cruz.

The fact that THESE are apparently the most qualified people out of 300 million is the most damning thing about the united states bar none. Either the US is full of idiots or the system is irrecoverably broken. Probably both.

Nope, those are literally the most qualified people in the US. These people would mess up the country, like, 1000 times less than anyone I know in person.
What, are you saying that people are more competent in other places?

You're forgetting Bernie Sanders in that list. Also, I doubt Trump would mess things up 1000 times less than anyone you know in person.

[Reelya]

Trump makes a brave stand against RINO SJW cucks.

If it's politically incorrect or "wrong" to respond to someone because they sport clear support for politically incorrect things like white nationalism or nazis or racism or fascism, is the alternative to not respond to them, ignore them completely, and basically pretend they don't exist? That sounds like a kind of censorship, ignoring someone because they don't have the "correct" opinions or beliefs held by the majority.

Idk, i don't think that's a good summary of what happened here. What actually happened is that a presidential candidate retweeted a message from an overt neo-nazi. This expresses support for not just the message, but expresses that the neo-nazi guy is a legitimate voice that should be listened to on a national stage.

The twitter account Trump retweeted uses the founder of the US Nazi party as his avatar, and lists "Jewmerica" as his location, amongst other things. Basically, it's just incredibly embarrassing that a presidential candidate could be that clueless.

Personally, while speech is free, listening is not. Assholes are free to yell and rant, but we're equally free to filter them out. I mean, if there's a panel discussion about slavery, we're not obligated to invite a guy who wants to turn all black women into his personal sex-slaves to the discussion, for "balance".

[Graknorke]

Agreeing with one thing a person says isn't the same as agreeing with everything that person says.