Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 529 530 [531] 532 533 ... 1342

Author Topic: Murrican Politics Megathread 2016: There Will Be Hell Toupée  (Read 1570259 times)

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7950 on: December 12, 2015, 03:11:32 am »

Well, you found one. While in an absolutely ideal scenario the right to reproduce would be allocated by random lot, I already have renounced it. Frankly, anyone who believes in the common good of humanity and this planet's future should.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7951 on: December 12, 2015, 03:14:26 am »

Maybe he's in favor of a one child policy like China had. I say had because IIRC they're moving away from it due to it having begun to cause serious problems for their economy and citizens, one of which is that retiring parents don't have a sufficient safety net, previously would have been taken care of by children, now lack enough children for that to be possible, and extreme levels of corruption in government makes using anything like the american social security system to solve the problem impossible (at least until the corruption is reduced somehow).

Random lot? That's not particularly fair. Also, it doesn't sound particularly enforceable, either. What are you going to do, go in and sterilize half the country and then get the rest after they've had a couple children?

P.S. Virtually all our population growth in the US is coming from immigration - not births. Check the statistics. You'll have to send the military to mass-sterilize OTHER countries. I bet that'll go over well.
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7952 on: December 12, 2015, 03:22:11 am »

Maybe he's in favor of a one child policy like China had.
A more strict and global version thereof. We should seek to balance out at about 1 billion total humans, excepting a scenario in which we create biological immortality or accidentally/intentionally create AI God, in the later case being particularly irrelevant.
Quote
Random lot? That's not particularly fair. Also, it doesn't sound particularly enforceable, either. What are you going to do, go in and sterilize half the country and then get the rest after they've had a couple children?
As I said, that would be the ideal, and it's completely fair. What would you do, only let the wealthy and intelligent breed?
Quote
P.S. Virtually all our population growth in the US is coming from immigration - not births. Check the statistics.
P.S. That's a fucking irrelevant cop-out that all western societies try to use to push the burden of population onto the idea of all the filthy brown people over there being unable to stop having children, developed nations in general and the US specifically all use obscene amounts of resources per capita compared to the more quickly growing undeveloped societies.

The answer you don't want to hear is we're already obscenely over the line and have been for decades. You'd need an extra three Earths of resources to keep this gravy train rolling at the population we have. Population is the fulcrum point. No magic future technology is going to swoop down and save us, no amount of efficiency is going to resist the hard numbers about both resource deprivation and climate disruption.

There are too many of us. That is the true answer. But you don't want to hear that, do you?
« Last Edit: December 12, 2015, 03:24:11 am by MetalSlimeHunt »
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Willfor

  • Bay Watcher
  • The great magmaman adventurer. I do it for hugs.
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7953 on: December 12, 2015, 03:29:12 am »

I was gonna let it drop because you were being reasonable, but every figure I've seen that looks right for sustainable populations says you're off by about an order of magnitude. 10 billion instead of 1 billion. So uh. Sources?

I would click the youtube, but I already have so much crap in my recommendeds, and I am scared that it is one of the angry white dudes who have skulls on their shelves. I've just started to not get those pop up in my recommendeds lately, and I'm not dealing with that again.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2015, 03:32:01 am by Willfor »
Logged
In the wells of livestock vans with shells and garden sands /
Iron mixed with oxygen as per the laws of chemistry and chance /
A shape was roughly human, it was only roughly human /
Apparition eyes / Apparition eyes / Knock, apparition, knock / Eyes, apparition eyes /

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7954 on: December 12, 2015, 03:30:09 am »

Telling me that I don't want to hear something that I'm already perfectly aware of isn't going to be a very effective way of convincing me that we need to start sterilizing people against their will.
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

Cheeetar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Spaceghost Perpetrator
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7955 on: December 12, 2015, 03:55:15 am »

I was gonna let it drop because you were being reasonable, but every figure I've seen that looks right for sustainable populations says you're off by about an order of magnitude. 10 billion instead of 1 billion. So uh. Sources?

I would click the youtube, but I already have so much crap in my recommendeds, and I am scared that it is one of the angry white dudes who have skulls on their shelves. I've just started to not get those pop up in my recommendeds lately, and I'm not dealing with that again.

I turned off all of the youtube history tracking things altogether just to avoid getting white supremacists and other assholes showing up in my recommends.
Logged
I've played some mafia.

Most of the time when someone is described as politically correct they are simply correct.

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7956 on: December 12, 2015, 03:57:03 am »

I didn't bother to click it either, but that was because I was annoyed. :V

P.S. You can always use incognito mode and then youtube shouldn't recognize you.
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7957 on: December 12, 2015, 04:05:51 am »

I've found almost everyone who thinks it's a good idea also believes that they should be exempt from it. Actually, I haven't found anyone who doesn't think that. You can't all be right.

Strange how people insist I dont exist, or worse, insist I am lieing when I say that the best method for the necessary population reduction is an accross the board removal of major interventionary healthcare, and that I am OK with living in that world, and being a statistic for death from a preventable illness.

Hell, I dont even want chemo should I be diagnosed with cancer.

The major issue: The wealthy and powerful would find ways to ensure that they recieve the healthcare, while the rest of the population remains out of the loop, because money talks. This makes the plan unworkable on the grounds of being essentially plebicide, instead of impartial population reduction.

and no, the current density of world population is only sustainable through highly carbon positive nitrogen fertilizer use, which coupled with climate change induced loss of farmland, is not a viable solution.

Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7958 on: December 12, 2015, 04:13:26 am »

I was gonna let it drop because you were being reasonable, but every figure I've seen that looks right for sustainable populations says you're off by about an order of magnitude. 10 billion instead of 1 billion. So uh. Sources?
I just got off of the end of the semester and drive back home, so you'll forgive me if I'm not digging through journals for peer-review quality and play this a bit more typical internet quality.

Firstly, I will establish the past viability of one billion. The last time we had that many people in the world was 1804, but rates of population growth before then had not started the S-curve pattern strongly, so we spent about 300 years going from 500 million to 1 billion (incidentally, these periods become exponentially shorter, and though they are now slowing the gross population is still the real problem). At this time we had some inkling of the problems to come with some of the larger cities, but the pattern of the Holocene extinction hadn't gotten started. The problems of this population are something our vaunted technological advancement actually can solve, since they were mostly centered around things like waste disposal we have somewhat down. As such, I don't think there's a substantial enough risk to this population point to dismiss it as too high. This is not true for higher figures.

Now, the present of 7.3 billion. Our actions have brought about substantial harm already. Our industrial activities have already fucked the ocean pretty badly by lowering the collective pH, which more or less kills everything. Even the things that can resist acidity changes are dependent upon things that cannot. This alone justifies population reduction. All life is ultimately dependent upon the connections laid down in the oceans, and we're fucking up bad if we think we can last without. Even this presumes the Clathrate gun is just chasing ghosts, and it isn't.

While you're between paragraphs, here's some backing of the obscene ignorance of how we collectively treat this issue. We're multiple levels of concern below rational ones.

We're gonna need 80% more electricity and 55% more water than we have now, by the way. You aren't going to magic that up. If you throw everything in the pot together and just ignore the CO2 problem you can get near the electricity figure. And if you think the problems aren't going to impact you, think again. California is in such a state of terminal drought I have no doubt that we will soon just wipe that slate clean and declare it the new metric of normal condition, because it is. And those polar vortexes aren't going to stop either.

But you probably already believe in climate change, so here's the rub. Even if we all lived relatively poorly, we'd still just be scraping the barrel, and that's if the population never goes up again. There is an inherent inverse relationship between what quality of life we may maintain without exceeding terminal replacement and the total population of the world. All of the numbers I have brought up over this entire thing can only intensify in a world where we don't stop reproducing so damn much.

As for "10 billion", how absolutely convenient for us that the number of people who will be in the world at current growth rates come 2100 is supposedly the number we can handle, so wonderfully just outside your expected lifespan just in case. That's a point set with some intent and as far as I've seen, never meaningfully backed. Here's someone you probably respect more than me and who knows his shit's take on it.
Telling me that I don't want to hear something that I'm already perfectly aware of isn't going to be a very effective way of convincing me that we need to start sterilizing people against their will.
It's more that society at large does not want to hear it. We collectively block out the obvious truth that there are too many people on this planet, even among otherwise zealous environmentalists, because this upsets the heart of conventional and traditional forces that are still the most powerful elements of most societies. Even things like postmodern culture and accepting homosexuality are not as utterly odious and repulsive to most people as telling them to stop shitting out children.

And, in all fairness, natalism is practically a part of our DNA. Continually frustrated as I am over it, it is essentially to be expected that people will prefer to latch onto ideas of "new technology will save us", "sustainable practices will save us", "it's just Over There that's the problem", anything to avoid the final conclusion. Unfortunately, once you read the numbers it becomes clear.

Now, much as I'd truly love just to ignore the desires of ignorant eater-types and dust them with sterilizing drugs, we all know that's both inefficient and very capable of backlash even in the world where we ignore or justify all moral concerns in much the same way you can't just kidnap the children of anti-vaxxers no matter how rational that seems.

Sadly, the need for at least a plurality agreement on not reproducing means it probably won't happen. But it should.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7959 on: December 12, 2015, 04:22:05 am »

The genetic imperative to reproduce is too strong.

That is why I favor increasing the mortality rate, through purposeful reductions in healthcare, and forbidding technologically assisted reproduction. (things like IVF and pals.)

People can keep making babies, if people die sooner.
Logged

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7960 on: December 12, 2015, 05:11:57 am »

In  some way, I think this thread would be improved by only letting mainiac post in it.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7961 on: December 12, 2015, 05:48:30 am »

That's why I'm in favor of the damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead approach to overpopulation. You're not going to convince the human race to collectively stop reproducing so much, that's pretty much the fundamental biological imperative, and most people can't reason their way out of a paper bag, never mind into casting off the deepest underlying motivation they have. So we have to get the fuck off of Earth and hope that the survivors a) find a habitable Earth-like terrestrial world before their cryo equipment breaks down/ship population breeds itself to death/&c. and b) manage to not fuck it up like we did this one until they can go full bio-mechanical Von Neumann and keep expanding.

Remember the migratory locust-like tentacle aliens from Independence Day? The ones that fly around stripping other worlds of resources before moving on again? That's the best-case scenario for humanity. The realistic scenario is that we continue to shove Earth into the meatgrinder, don't muster the will to evacuate until it's too late, and end up either wiping ourselves out or with a tiny, fragmented population living in sealed arcologies desperately trying to break even on their resources for however many thousands or millions of years it takes for the planet to recover.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7962 on: December 12, 2015, 06:00:57 am »

Now, the present of 7.3 billion. Our actions have brought about substantial harm already.

Depletion of resources does not overwhelmingly correlate to economic activity.  It is in fact possible to have more economic activity in the long run in a sustainable fashion then an unsustainable fashion.

Case in point, the Dust Bowl happened when we were trying to feed a population of 100 million people in the US.  Now we are feeding three times that and have no fear of a similar event.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7963 on: December 12, 2015, 06:15:05 am »

*lives in kansas, which was ground zero for the dustbowl. Feels compelled to point out error from ignorance.


The major intervention in kansas and Oklahoma to prevent massive topsoil loss, was the planting of windbreak hedge rows along section lines and roadsides.

There is an alarming trend to rip those out by the newest generation of farmers, since the 5 to 6 yard strip around the section tabulates to a sizeable area that "could be planted to wheat/soybean/corn/etc."

As they do this to be competative, the risk of dust bowl part 2 increases.  I have personally seen feilds blowing in the wind from this happening.

The typical ideology is that such things cant happen again, when they most certainly can and will, should the windbreaks be removed.

Long story short: Dont think you have seen the last of such disasters.
Logged

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #7964 on: December 12, 2015, 06:20:09 am »

Feels compelled to point out error from ignorance.

We just had the toad in here and you are flame baiting.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.
Pages: 1 ... 529 530 [531] 532 533 ... 1342