Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 313 314 [315] 316 317 ... 1342

Author Topic: Murrican Politics Megathread 2016: There Will Be Hell Toupée  (Read 1584573 times)

Vilanat

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4710 on: September 30, 2015, 05:53:28 am »

Military R&D had partially and in some cases even mainly led to many technologies such as the Internet, GPS, digital imagery, Canned food, countless medical applications, Jet planes, countless logistics solutions, countless sensory technologies, renewable energy technologies, water desalination and many others that you take for granted. i don't see how you can end world hunger without a lot of the technologies that began life as military funded projects. You could argue that some other entity would have invested in those if the military hadn't, but well, that's entirely within the realm of fantasy alternate history.
Logged

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4711 on: September 30, 2015, 07:04:52 am »

Before we start spending less money on stuff that kills and more on actual developmental aid, we need to fix the current situation, where for example, if you want to build the poor folks a water pump, you have to spend 5 dollars on a pump, 1 dollar on local labour costs, 1000 dollars on bribes, and 10000 dollars on armed guards and munitions to protect the labourers installing the pump* (and shoot copper thieves/starving children who try to steal pump parts). And stop paying charity CEOs 100k or more per month.

* note that these are fictive numbers for argument's sake
« Last Edit: September 30, 2015, 07:11:17 am by martinuzz »
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4712 on: September 30, 2015, 07:33:51 am »

Kevin Spacey has confirmed that in a fight between the two fictional characters, Francis Underwood and Donald Trump, Francis would win

Helgoland

  • Bay Watcher
  • No man is an island.
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4713 on: September 30, 2015, 08:13:58 am »

This may not be a good way to discuss implementation of policies, but that discussion will never even begin until we accept that the primary issue here is one of priorities.  I'm very used to getting the whole 'reality is more complicated than you're making it out to be' bit, but no discussion can ever constructively dig into the crunch of details until there is agreement on the premises and guiding principles that discussion will operate on.
Hm, I guess we're talking past each other: As far as I can tell, we already agree on the fundamentals of this issue: The US military is too big, military action is often, but not always a bad thing, conflict prevention and development aid are preferrable to military action, etc etc.

Maybe it's a cultural issue: When a German talks like you do, they usually espouse some sort of vulgar pacifism, usually accompanied by a big helping of anti-Americanism and NIMBYism. And I guess when an American talks like I do, they're usually Republican and quite far on the hawkish side.
Maybe we should just skip ahead to the specifics: When do you consider military intervention to be desirable or even just justifiable?
Logged
The Bay12 postcard club
Arguably he's already a progressive, just one in the style of an enlightened Kaiser.
I'm going to do the smart thing here and disengage. This isn't a hill I paticularly care to die on.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4714 on: September 30, 2015, 08:33:56 am »


Maybe we should just skip ahead to the specifics: When do you consider military intervention to be desirable or even just justifiable?

Like when Iraq invaded Kuwait, or maybe the Bosnia conflict? Although that one was a massive coalition and we can't intervene every time someone invades someone.

Theres also stuff like peacekeeping, but generally the UN is supposed to be in charge of that.
Logged

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4715 on: September 30, 2015, 10:17:20 am »

Did anyone else watch the Bill Clinton interview on CNN last night?
Logged

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4716 on: September 30, 2015, 10:35:00 am »

Don't watch TV in general, so... no. Did find a transcript here, though. Reading through it now.

Anything particularly interesting about it?

E: Can't speak for how he said it, but the words transcribed seemed... competent? Fairly well chosen, did a pretty good job of staying on the metaphorical high ground instead of sniping at people, had a bit of human interest at the end. Appears to be a pretty good showing?
« Last Edit: September 30, 2015, 10:51:23 am by Frumple »
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4717 on: September 30, 2015, 12:23:01 pm »

Don't watch TV in general, so... no. Did find a transcript here, though. Reading through it now.

Anything particularly interesting about it?

E: Can't speak for how he said it, but the words transcribed seemed... competent? Fairly well chosen, did a pretty good job of staying on the metaphorical high ground instead of sniping at people, had a bit of human interest at the end. Appears to be a pretty good showing?

I watched a little bit and have heard about it in general. I think Hillary should defend herself rather than have her husband defend her. I mean, you don't see Carly's husband defending her on CNN.

Also, apparently CNN is going to be streaming the debate in 3D virtual reality: http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2015/09/24/cnn-will-live-stream-democratic-debate-in-virtual-reality/

How about something for those who don't have a VR headset? :P
Logged

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4718 on: September 30, 2015, 12:57:42 pm »

Far as I've noticed hillary's said all she needs to say on the email stuff. Pretty okay with someone calling that bullshit what it is regardless of their relationship to the person in question, heh. Didn't even strike me as a defense, though, personally, just someone with better insight than most explaining the situation as what it is, as the interviewer requested. Then a little bit of fluffing on the side, heh.

I'd probably recommend reading that transcript I just linked, yeah. It's not even that long, and is probably significantly better for finding out what was actually said than second hand information (which is, as we all know by this point, often brutally warped) or partially absorbed listening.
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

RedKing

  • Bay Watcher
  • hoo hoo motherfucker
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4719 on: September 30, 2015, 01:01:11 pm »

So apparently while he was here, the Pope met with Kim Davis. And reportedly backed her.

Suddenly, all those US progressives that have been wearing Pope t-shirts are going, "Wait wha??"
Logged

Remember, knowledge is power. The power to make other people feel stupid.
Quote from: Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Science is like an inoculation against charlatans who would have you believe whatever it is they tell you.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4720 on: September 30, 2015, 01:05:38 pm »

He wasn't defending her over the emails (which now just needs to let the investigation run it's course), he was defending her over the accusation of 'worst seceretary of state ever'. It's just my opinion that Hillary needs to defend herself over that rather than have Bill defend her.

So apparently while he was here, the Pope met with Kim Davis. And reportedly backed her.

Suddenly, all those US progressives that have been wearing Pope t-shirts are going, "Wait wha??"

He's a mixed bag of conservative and progressive, progressive with some things and hyper-conservative on others.
Logged

i2amroy

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cats, ruling the world one dwarf at a time
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4721 on: September 30, 2015, 01:10:13 pm »

Yeah, I think it's important for us to remember that just because this Pope is much more liberal than previous Popes in some things doesn't necessarily mean that he is "liberal" in everything. AFAIK his stance on gays has always been "while we don't necessarily approve of gay couples, we should at least love/tolerate them", and the idea of conscientious objection sort of fits that to a "T" (of course the problem with the idea is that ideally in such a situation someone else should immediately be able to step in and complete the paperwork/etc. right there instead of your conscientious objection being the same as a forbidal). It's one of the two big things I've noticed (the other being abortion) where the Pope's views, while still not right-wing nutcase levels, are noticeably more conservative than liberal.
Logged
Quote from: PTTG
It would be brutally difficult and probably won't work. In other words, it's absolutely dwarven!
Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead - A fun zombie survival rougelike that I'm dev-ing for.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4722 on: September 30, 2015, 01:13:56 pm »

He wasn't defending her over the emails (which now just needs to let the investigation run it's course)

The investigation hasn't run the course?  But we've already been through so many weeks of exclusives and revelations.  Oh joy, more of this!
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4723 on: September 30, 2015, 01:16:34 pm »

Suddenly, all those US progressives that have been wearing Pope t-shirts are going, "Wait wha??"
Instead of wearing memorabilia shirts, they should be campaigning for the pope to wear a sign around his neck that says, "Still Catholic, Folks." And maybe a bell or somethin', I'unno. So that people will be less surprised that he is, in fact, the catholic pope. To the rest of it, by and large the dude's not actually terribly more progressive, if at all, than previous popes. He's just largely better at framing things so he looks less like a backassward jackwad. Directs words towards the more defensible/positive aspects, still as catholic as soiling yourself in a confessional.

And @smj, I'm just kinda' scratching my head at that. Her record's largely public knowledge. There's still no real need to defend, and just about everything that's really necessary to say has been said, imo. Trump et al spewing bullshit doesn't really change that to any substantial degree. I guess it'll need to be repeated at some point, because people have the political memories of lobotomized goldfish, but still.

Beyond that, hell, if your husband isn't going to go to bat for you, who should? Him staying mum on the subject, especially considering his background and history, would probably be worse from the campaigning point of view than anything else. Hillary'll say what needs saying in time, to the extent she hasn't already.

And nah, mainiac, far as I'm aware it's run the course several times already. Think they've just started up another one or somethin'. They can't seem to find anything more damaging, somehow.
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: American Election Megathread- Voting Trump/Wallace in '168
« Reply #4724 on: September 30, 2015, 01:19:10 pm »

He wasn't defending her over the emails (which now just needs to let the investigation run it's course)

The investigation hasn't run the course?  But we've already been through so many weeks of exclusives and revelations.  Oh joy, more of this!

I haven't heard anything of the investigation formally concluding. Besides, she still has that hearing later in October and they're releasing thousands more sometime today. So, while it may very well be BS, it hasn't gone away and the emails are still dripping.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 313 314 [315] 316 317 ... 1342