https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_South_American_Nations
UNASUR: GDP $US4 trillion dollars, population 414 million. Members: every fucking country in South America (not counting some small UK colonies).
Explain yourself, where is this clay?
Sorry I was mixing up French Guiana and British Guiana. British Guiana declared independence, but are still subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of England. So, arguably still under British rule. They are also part of UNASUR. French Guiana are directly a French territory, so they couldn't join UNASUR.
Guyana are not subjects of HM Queen Elizabeth II, they're a Parliamentary Republic and even the Commonwealth Realms with Queen Elizabeth as their official heads of states are clearly not under British rule, being fully independent sovereign states.
So, it's in the biased coverage, or lack of coverage, of important events from Latin America ("don't mention UNASUR" and printing blatant BS about Hugo Chavez) that you can peer through the curtain and see the gears clunking along in the so-called "liberal" side of the corporate media. As far as corporate media goes, "lib" and "con" represent two factions of a wealthy elite class with different worldviews. But they share US corporate interests as a shared interest, so that bias pervades all corporate media.
There are a hell of a lot more factions than liberals and conservatives, of which the wealthy elite do not particularly care much about. It helps when influencing politics to diversify your owned politicians, thus one would be a fool to not own both sides, in reality not being more than two faces on the same penny lol
To a lot of Americans though, South America is still more than third world and less than 1st world.
To use a phrase often used to describe SE Asia, 1st world nations with 3rd world maintenance
What about the Falklands?
British Overseas Territory
Well I guess we could count that too, if we count Falklands as part of South America. I'm guessing that the UK wouldn't want it to "count" as part of the continent because it's not actually joined. But plenty of islands in Europe are counted as part of Europe, and Japan, Taiwan and Philippines are all part of "Asia", so there's no much of a consistent reason not to count Falklands as part of South America. It's certainly part of the "Americas", and if you split that into North, Central and South Americas, it's clearly in the South.
Nah you've confused terminology of convenience with terminology of geography. For example we refer to the European Continent as the great big landmass of mainland Europe whilst referring to the British Isles separately, but if you look at our maps of Europe, lo and behold the British Isles are of the European Continent. Same way as the Falklands being referred to as the Archipelago off the South American Continent or even how the Chinese differentiate between mainland and islanders
EDIT: To give an idea of the under-reporting about UNASUR, which is one of the biggest political developments in the Western Hemishpere in decades, this is the nytimes seach for all articles containing "unasur"
A political development has to actually develop for it to be a development
Meanwhile, "Kardiashian" gets 1086 hits, in the same time period.
http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/kardashian/from20070101to20161212/allresults/2/allauthors/oldest/
Americans care more about Kardashians than geopolitical ambitions m8 $$$$$$
Nothing's happening with UNASUR
Victoria Murillo told me, “Brazil to UNASUR is like Germany to the EU. Success will depend on member countries’ willingness to accept Brazil as a leader.” For UNASUR to come together Brazil will need to take on more of a leadership role, working with other member-countries to lower trade barriers and create a common market.
Joao Castro Neves, a Brazil analyst at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy recently told me that in the short term UNASUR’s institutionalization “will be very slow and incremental” and the group will “remain a forum for dialogue in the foreseeable future.”
UNASUR will remain an effective forum for South American diplomatic relations, but it’s not likely to become the European Union any time soon.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2012/11/30/can-south-america-become-the-new-european-union/#46781ed337e9
It's everything I wish the European Union was