what DOES represent stellar fusion to you?
In my opinion there is no one clear symbol.
For me, most fusion is better described by the
magnetohydrodynamics of plasmas than the reactions themselves and the incredibly elegant but complex equations and diagrams that come from that would be my primary symbols of
fusion.
However, stars to me are about stellar evolution and gravitational compression balanced by the energy released by fusion. The balance between those two forces (keeping the fusion burning at a continuous, low level for millennia) is more elegant than either of them on their own, and the complete model of stellar evolution is more illustrative of life, the universe and everything than any one instance within it. The production of heavy elements in late series stars, etc.
But I don't think I could reduce either of these topics into an elegant tattoo ever. I'd either go for something far more fundamental (and I don't see that particular fusion equation as being particularly fundamental) or something more personally meaningful. If it was about the fusion than something from electromagnetism, probably one of the ideal MHD equations. If it were about the stellar side then either a cross section of a star,
a coronal mass ejectino or a diagram of stellar evolution itself, somehow.
I'm happy to go into any topics you are interested in, but it's a vast topic and my personal interests and preferences (and yes, aesthetics) are likely to play into it. I'm a
MCF fan which biases me towards the plasma and balance side of things. The actual fusion interactions are less interesting - important even - than the mechanics that make them possible and cause them to continue for thousands of years.
No he's doing it on his own and he have years. They are fun books and endearing and when you master them (with the help of other books), well you really understand basic physics.
Not really. You would be much better off starting with an actual introductory physics textbook (there are a wealth of options, but I can personally vouch for Young and Freedman and have ready good things about Matter and Interaction) then specialist books for various topics. Feynman can make you feel like you understand more often than he can actually help you understand on a level that lets you work with the topic in the future. Which is a same because he is great fun to read and more or less got me to take the degree I did.
BTW, anyone looking for books/recommendations can PM me. I might be able to help out a bit.