It's perfectly possible for an individual person to be misandrist even if no cultural context for misandry exist. Sure, the consequence won't be as bad for the victim, but it's still totally possible.
the concept of misandry is a myth and its use is often by MRAs and Red-Pillers to complain about any feminist or being friend-zoned and having a women react angrily when they realize the friendship was just a ploy to get in her pants. Plus whatever else those types complain about. The concept as it is used is that "those feminists" are promoting a mass hatred for men.
Honestly, most of us, as in the very vast majority, do not hate men, and when we have to spend our entire time promising men that really, we don't hate them, nothing actually gets discussed. Calling misandry is a way to silence a feminist.
I don't really think there is any systematic misandry, so I could agree that that is a myth (I wouldn't quite use that word though). It is still certainly possible, however uncommon, for an individual to be misandric, or to eschew misandric ideas. The very fact that you stated "the very vast majority, do not hate men" (there does exist some people who do hate men) seems to imply you agree.
It's a loaded term though. A lot of the time I see the term used for the very purpupose you state, so I can understand why it would invoke such strong suspicions of an ulterior motive, and I would also be suspicious of anyone going around using the term misandrist.
Smeeprocket what makes you an expert? Other then listening to the general garbage that gets pushed out by the media and misandrists puritans?
this quote implies that feminists are mysandrist puritans (I don't understand the puritans part.)
It actually doesn't. It is a
Reductio ad absurdum of your logic, so if anything it sort of implies the opposite.