20+ pages have I endured to deliver this post.[/sarcasm] Please point out anything relevant I may have missed.
So addressing a few D2 things because I pretty much dropped about midway through it, and Vivalas brought them up recently.
(also thanks to flarbot for fixing mine and Vivalas' quote trainwreck that day)
3.Because I missed the TolyK post earlier on. I felt like doing RVS being my first post of the game, why are you so inclined against pitting me against Scripten and Perseus?
I was not inclined to pit you against anyone, despite what you may be inclined to believe.
Deathsword: Why is your response even more aggressive to my attack on TolyK, then TolyK was himself? Perhaps my attack on him raised scrutiny, but now that Caz has been alleged scum, I seem to wonder if Caz's scrutiny of TolyK's aggressive response was not in the best interest of the town, and am losing scrutiny of TolyK.
Aggressive behaviour is good on mafia. If you are not aggressive, and thus passive, you'll get nothing out of no one. Furthermore, at the time I was wary of the multiple cop claims and thus had doubts Caz was truly scum (and turns out that Caz wasn't).
Why did you conveniently not answer my questions? Did you not answer my questions, to get me to answer yours? Do you think that not holding up expectations you hold to others is the correct way to solve problems? I think perhaps the more mature response would of been to answer my questions, then ask why I didn't answer yours, unless of course you might think answering my questions would not be in your best interest.
I see no questions prior to the post I'm quoting that I did not answer. Every single time I accused you of not answering or dodging a question, I provided quotes of said questions.
Do you think that TolyK is scum? (Yes/No answer please)
I did not at the time this was relevant. Mind you, my read then on TolyK was neutral.
Vivalas your whole "case" one me is based on
ONE post directed to me after I started having health problems. Your vote right now is based on the fact that I did not answer a few weak questions on D2, questions that seem to be borne, based on your wording and attitude, on the fact that in D1 I pressed you to answer questions. You have pointed ZERO scum behaviour on my part, while you yourself continues to alternate between lurking and active-lurking. At the end of D2 you suddenly pop to life to make a single weak vote on Caz, thus joining the bandwagon. You are lazy scum or an anti-town third party, and I'd very much like to see your flip.
And before anyone accuses me of tunelling, that is pretty much my MO. I am not ignoring the rest of the players, mind you, but I find it more efficient to focus on one until either they are dead or do not seem scummy any more. And Vivalas has yet to look less scummy to me.
Silthuri, Deathsword, Persus, what do you all think of this double cop double miller situation?
Outdated question, but answer still: I didn't believe there was a scum player who could incriminate others at the time, hence my suspicion that one of the (or both) cops might have been fakeclaimers. My behaviour at D3 start also reflected that. With Tiruin dead, though, it seems at least Deus is indeed a cop and I have no current suspicions about them.
Deathsword (no obvious, dedicated scum-hunting from you. (Correct me if I'm wrong))
If you look at D1 and the first half of D2, you'll see I did a pretty comprehensive case on Vivalas then. I had to drop after that for health reasons.
Deathsword: Why you no vote?
Cuz I was read. I vote now.
Author
Topic: Operation Overlord, Day Five: Game Over! Town, Town-Ally, and Survivor Victory! (Read 110353 times)