Apparently Belarus is afraid of Russia pulling a Crimea on them.
According to a copy of the law published online, Minsk will view the deployment of another nation's armed groups, irregular forces, mercenaries or regular military units in the country as a military attack, regardless of whether or not it was accompanied by a declaration of war.
The real question is: why does anyone feel the need to elaborate that? You'd think that people'd consider an attack an attack regardless of whether or not the belligerent party politely announces their intention.
I'd say it's a political maneuver first and foremost. Belarus simply needed to declare that it is not just another part of Russia, but a country in its own right. Still, I see no great consequences of this law.
Knit Tie, weren't you dismissing the Levada Center has an hopelessly partisan sources of news earlier?
I wonder how Russia's relations with Belarus will end. You'd think that after 1956 and 1968, Russia would know that friendship cannot be obtained at gunpoint.
News? Indeed. Its commentary is firmly anti-Putin and anti-Russian in general. But the Levada Center is also
an excellent source of genuine, unbiased, untampered with polls, which can be said to carry even more weight than those made by Rosstat, the official Russian polling agency, since they cannot be said to ever be sympathetic with the current government. If Levada centre says that, for example, 65% of the people suport Lavrov, it most likely will be the truth.
As for Belarus, I don't think there will be an end to its relations with Russia any time soon.
@Erkki: To be honest, I was surprised there was any draft avoidance at all - Ukrainians in general are not known for cowardice and selfishness.