There are actual porn games.
I would like to reiterate this. There are actual fully produced and released porn games. We're not talking about Meet 'n Fuck Kingdom here. Custer's Revenge was one of the first of them. There are a few that ran on MS-DOS. Porn games have been around almost as long as video games have had graphics sophisticated enough to show dongs.
Actually, the
porn games started even before graphics existed. The text game LSL was based on came out in 1981, a year before Custer's Revenge.
It warms my heart, in a nostalgic way, to see moral guardians up in arms about violence in a video game. I thought we'd need another school shooting before that happened again.
>Implying there haven't been several in the past year alone.
It's a new era, the next wave of game-related violence is going to be office ladies murdering people with giant candies. Recent studies have found that
game difficulty / frustration is the key variable for raising aggression, not violent imagery. Which shows that all psychological studies should always be taken with a grain of salt since they usually test for only one theory and if they get a positive correlation the media claims the link is "proven" when they haven't even started listing let alone ruled out all possible explanations.
According to the study, playing Tetris at too high a difficulty level makes participants think up nastier punishments for other people, compared to participants who played Tetris at an easier level. This is why you always need control cases in studies. You could easily engineer a "study" where someone plays GTA at a high difficultly level, or some plays it who isn't good at that type of game, get elevate aggression purely due to the same mechanism that makes Tetris players angry, and "prove" that GTA caused the aggression. The media would totally buy it as "science".
If you go by ther Rochester study, you could basically force someone to complete difficult Sudokus with a time limit and get higher aggression readings than any violent video game study to date. This effect basically means all studies prior to 2014 should just be thrown in the bin and we start again.