Shakerag: See below.
Shakerag: Are you anti-Shakerag?
You know, as opposed to (or in addition to) town or mafia?
You've had plenty of non-weekend time to answer that, so don't try that excuse on me.
PPE: You've made several vague proclamations without anything to back them up. Put up or shut up if you want anyone to care what you have to say.
Varee: If your reads are (
as you say) "mostly useless," then what are you doing to improve them?
To be frank all the random reads mostly mean "I haven't got a clue and I feel like putting random stuff in instead of blanks"
I'm not even sure how to respond to this.
Cheeetar:
It seems likely that Shakerag are not a mafia-esque group- at least, not an informed minority. That would imply that anti-Shakerags are the informed minority?
Given you've claimed to appear as a Shakerag despite not being one, wouldn't that put you in that group? Are you a... uh... Anti-Shakerag-Ally?
Persus:
Toaster:
... but if you're only interested in killing mafia (as a townie would be (?)) ...
I am interested in killing scum. I define scum as "anyone who actively wants to hinder town." This definition includes cults, SKs, lynchers, and the like; and it can also include people who we can't trust to work with us. Especially since I (thought I) had a daykill; I could use it outside of the lynch process to go ahead and eliminate someone who wasn't on our side.
And you didn't just cite the town wincon in this argument because?
I thought that spelling things out made it clearer, especially since he didn't like my brief answer from before.
Persus:
Also, I'm voting GayArchea because he's barely posted. Due to a lack of really scummy players (besides mastahcheese, but no one is currently defending him, so he might just be badly playing town), I would rather get rid of someone who hasn't been playing then people who are trying to contribute.
This is a very weaksauce and inoffensive vote. It's almost like you're trying to stay in the background and not step on anyone's toes.
Almost.
I'm glad you agree.