Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Hahahahahaha!

7 (41.2%)

Nooooooooooo!

10 (58.8%)

Total Members Voted: 17

[Andres]

Expect bias.

Cim: True Neutral (neither Evil nor Good and never tries enforcing any laws or Council rules. Then there was that thing where he preferred capitalistic freedom over law....)
Fusil: Chaotic Evil (nice to his followers but a total d*ck to everyone else)
Azem: Chaotic Evil until redemption (economy stuff), otherwise Neutral Good
Khaziraad: True Neutral, very occasionally Neutral Evil
Grauel: Neutral Evil (he made a Bubble which means he's in tight with the Void.)
Serac: True Neutral (he's at 0-0 because he's no longer an active god - he's been retired so Kaladin can play as Atropos)
Joha: Lawful Good (Lawful because the only thing she does nowadays is vote on proposals)
Neron: Lawful Evil (just what is he working on at NUKE?)
Darruth: "Nice"(Neutral?) Good
Quéßäre: Lawful Good (of all people...)
KI'Tork: Chaotic Neutral
Malakath: Lawful Good (definitely not "Nice" Good)
Atropos: Chaotic Neutral
Melyssa: Neutral Evil/Neutral
Fortuna: Chaotic Neutral/Good

[Rolepgeek]

...suspicion and/or Void activity =/= Evil.

From everything I've seen about the Void, it's like any other political power system: Some people are dicks, some people are honest, but everyone's trying to gain something out of it, even if they didn't want to at first.

Also IcyTea listed Cim as Lawful Evil.

This disturbs, worries, and suspiciofies me.

[Andres]

Except in this case, everyone's honestly trying to be dicks by gaining everyone else's stuff, regardless of if those people want it or not. I'm talking about Nulls, of course. Gods aren't honest about it.

[Andres]

Yaos: Chaotic Neutral

Yaos is an interesting case. Initially he was Neutral Evil, but he quickly became Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic Neutral and occasionally Good after some character development and friend-making.

[Stirk]

Yaos is an interesting case. Initially he was Neutral Evil, but he quickly became Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic Neutral and occasionally Good after some character development and friend-making.

And still occasionally Evil, and so far the only God who was killed while active.

Whatever, I still don't like D&D style binary morality scales.

[DreamerGhost]

Yaos: Chaotic Neutral

Yaos is an interesting case. Initially he was Neutral Evil, but he quickly became Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic Neutral and occasionally Good after some character development and friend-making.

Kinda in set with his death date changes and his sphere changes.

I spent 5E on thermoproofing my greater angels, it says so in tick post.

[IcyTea31]

Whatever, I still don't like D&D style binary morality scales.

I can agree somewhat. Trying to fit everyone into just 9 categories is simple and easy, but on the other hand, you are trying to fit everyone into just 9 categories.

[Vgray]

Fusil has died at least twice.

[Stirk]

Fusil has died at least twice.

He got better. Yaos didn't.

[Andres]

Kinda in set with his death date changes and his sphere changes.

Actually, he made the morality switch a while before even the attack on STF.

He got better. Yaos didn't.

Yaos got better like fives times.

[Stirk]

Actually, he made the morality switch a while before even the attack on STF.

You mean when he got a bunch of people together to kill an imprisoned God? Yeah, that isn't much of a morality change.

Yaos got better like fives times.

Then abruptly stopped getting better.

[Andres]

You mean when he got a bunch of people together to kill an imprisoned God? Yeah, that isn't much of a morality change.

That was an interesting story, actually. Now that I'm not playing Yaos anymore, I'm ok with telling you his intentions and motivations for the attack. Of course, that information comes at the cost of 2E. It would normally be 1E, but this isn't a trivial matter. For an extra 1E I can provide info on what the other gods were doing, as far as Yaos knew.

[Stirk]

You mean when he got a bunch of people together to kill an imprisoned God? Yeah, that isn't much of a morality change.

That was an interesting story, actually. Now that I'm not playing Yaos anymore, I'm ok with telling you his intentions and motivations for the attack. Of course, that information comes at the cost of 2E. It would normally be 1E, but this isn't a trivial matter. For an extra 1E I can provide info on what the other gods were doing, as far as Yaos knew.

It is more fun to guess, you essence hungry glutton... It is fairly obvious that you did it because of the Void pact, the one that killed you when I revived  . I wonder what that talking jelly roll told me about the Void pact? Ill tell you for 10^100 essence.

[Andres]

If you buy the info I'll tell you if it was for the Void pack or not. I'll also tell you if there was a Void pack to begin with. I don't expect Yaos to revive and I have no reason to hold on to the information so it'll definitely be the truth.

[Stirk]

If you buy the info I'll tell you if it was for the Void pack or not. I'll also tell you if there was a Void pack to begin with. I don't expect Yaos to revive and I have no reason to hold on to the information so it'll definitely be the truth.

You do realize that, in character, Fusil could just find one of Yaos's Angels and read its mind for this information? Free and easy. Nobody is going to pay you for information -_-. I guess I could just give it all away for free, declawing this tactic completely....