Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Cptn Kaladin Anrizlokum]

If a human tried to kill you Fusil, what would you do? Let them walk away unpunished?

What if you found out I ordered that human to assassinate you? Would you not take action?

[Lost in Nowhere]

Regardless of who is to blame for the assassination attempt, you have still openly expressed a desire to kill Cim, which violates the same law.

[Stirk]

If a human tried to kill you Fusil, what would you do? Let them walk away unpunished?

What if you found out I ordered that human to assassinate you? Would you not take action?

"I would defend myself, as is my legal right. Considering a mortal trying to assassinate the God of weapons with, presumably a mortal weapon, this would mostly involve me standing around slightly amused. What I would not do, however, is run to the council and order that human thrown in jail. I would handle it myself. Certainly Cim can fight off a being that is not a god without the help of nine other deities?"

Regardless of who is to blame for the assassination attempt, you have still openly expressed a desire to kill Cim, which violates the same law.

"How so? Do you even know what 'Seek' means? It does not violate any law."

[gman8181]

Putting all that aside, the demons are more or less gone now right? So the Gruen - Human conflict should resume now, no?

[Lost in Nowhere]

In the context of death and destruction, "seek" generally means "to try to bring about".


Can we just lock up Fusil already?

[Kilojoule Proton]

Lawmode concise status:

(We really need a more refined set of rules for future cases. I'm not sure if "innocence until proven guilty" is being applied here, but this is a bit of an extraordinary case.)

34.02: Seal Fusil away for (5-1/16)
+5 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.1: Seal Fusil away for a tick
+1 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.3: Seal Fusil away for 3 ticks
+1 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.6: Seal Fusil away for 6 ticks
+1 from Yaos, Joha, Serac
-1 from Fusil
dd

34.03: Seal Strike Team Fusil away as well (2-2/16)
+2 from Joha and Yaos
0 from Grauel
-2 from Fusil and Darruth
34.03.1.: Limit sealing Strike Team Fusil so that its members may defend Fusil (3-2/16)
+3 from Grauel, Serac, Azem, and Khaziraad
-1 from Yaos
34.03.2:  Limit sealing angels in general so that they may defend their creators (5-0/16)
+1 from Grauel, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Khaziraad, Yaos
34.03.3: Bind Cim's angels to guard Cim if Cim is imprisoned
+1 from Yaos

34.04: Lock away both Cim and Fusil or neither of them (3-0/16)
+3 from Azem, Yaos, and Darruth
-1 from Yaos

34.05: A trial will end after 2 integer ticks (from Tx to Tx+2) with votes tallied based solely on support and opposition. Conflict results in comparing support and opposition.
+1 from Yaos

[Lost in Nowhere]

Oppose 34.04
Support 34.05

[Cptn Kaladin Anrizlokum]

Support 34.05
Oppose 34.04

[Ambidextrous]

"I support 34.03, 34.03.2, and 34.05."

[Stirk]

In the context of death and destruction, "seek" generally means "to try to bring about".


Can we just lock up Fusil already?

"But I didn't bring it about, nor attempt to. Tykki did. Thus I had broken no law, or had Tykki. By your own definition, I have broken no law. Does everyone truly care enough for Cim to try and stop me?"

[Cptn Kaladin Anrizlokum]

Does everyone truly care enough for Cim to try and stop me?

You said you were going to kill him, and it was not an empty threat. I am willing to work to defend Cim from you. I prefer Cim to you.

You have access to the books, those that where not stolen, find out for yourself. I am afraid that will have to go for our hungry friend, too. "

All of the void books were stolen. Every single one.

[Stirk]

You said you were going to kill him, and it was not an empty threat. I am willing to work to defend Cim from you. I prefer Cim to you.

"Of course you do. He is a member of your little godly void cult, surrendering our 'bubble' to the invaders. I was referring to everyone else, who Cim's sadistic and petty attacks have effected."

All of the void books were stolen. Every single one.

"All the books in the library where stolen. Surly, you can think of another way of finding books."

[Rolepgeek]

Your flagrant abuse of semantics and wording in an effort to get your way, and the fact that Cim is, regardless of any guilt by association you seem to think is just enough cause to warrant his death, a god of Law and Order, means I am compelled to prevent you from doing such a heinous thing as this.

Or to put it another way; I believe it has become exceedingly clear that we mean to stop you in this endeavour. Your innocence is no more clear at this point than Cim's, Fusil. The truth will be found, and the appropriate judgment meted out accordingly. But you will not desecrate the sanctity and trust of this council by shattering it's laws on a whim.

[Kilojoule Proton]

I didn't miss any actions, did I? I'm a bit in a hurry for the next one and a half hours or so.

Spoiler: Votes updated (click to show/hide)

34.02: Seal Fusil away for (5-1/16)
+5 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.1: Seal Fusil away for a tick
+1 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.3: Seal Fusil away for 3 ticks
+1 from Yaos, Serac, Azem, Joha, and Kli
0 from Khaziraad
-1 from Fusil
34.02.6: Seal Fusil away for 6 ticks
+1 from Yaos, Joha, Serac
-1 from Fusil
dd

34.03: Seal Strike Team Fusil away as well (3-2/16)
+3 from Joha, Yaos, and Kli
0 from Grauel
-2 from Fusil and Darruth
34.03.1.: Limit sealing Strike Team Fusil so that its members may defend Fusil (3-2/16)
+3 from Grauel, Serac, Azem, and Khaziraad
-1 from Yaos
34.03.2:  Limit sealing angels in general so that they may defend their creators (5-0/16)
+7 from Grauel, Serac, Azem, Joha, Khaziraad, Yaos, and Kli
34.03.3: Bind Cim's angels to guard Cim if Cim is imprisoned
+1 from Yaos

34.04: Lock away both Cim and Fusil or neither of them (3-3/16)
+3 from Azem, Yaos, and Darruth
-2 from Yaos, Joha, Serac

34.05: A trial will end after 2 integer ticks (from Tx to Tx+2) with votes tallied based solely on support and opposition. Conflict results in comparing support and opposition. (4-0.16)
+4 from Yaos, Joha, Serac, and Kli

[Stirk]

Your flagrant abuse of semantics and wording in an effort to get your way, and the fact that Cim is, regardless of any guilt by association you seem to think is just enough cause to warrant his death, a god of Law and Order, means I am compelled to prevent you from doing such a heinous thing as this.

"Guild by association? He ordered the death of my followers. That is murder, yet everyone turns their head away for some reason. He is a murderer, a lawBreaker (see what I did there?), and a demon-consorter. All of those actions are something he did himself, with full knowlage of their implications."

Or to put it another way; I believe it has become exceedingly clear that we mean to stop you in this endeavour. Your innocence is no more clear at this point than Cim's, Fusil. The truth will be found, and the appropriate judgment meted out accordingly. But you will not desecrate the sanctity and trust of this council by shattering it's laws on a whim.

"Do you know what 'guilty until proven innocent' is? The words that slithered out of your mouth seem to. In case you havn't notice, I don't like the laws. They are useless, constricting, and weakening. There is no point to them. Almost like Cim. If I am killing the god of laws, what makes you think something as petty as a law will stop me? That would be true irony."