It does include lesbianism, it's in there.
Also
He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That’s enough!” he replied.
—Gospel of Luke 22:36-38, NIV
The thing about buying swords is another ridiculous misinterpretation that can be defeated not through tortured reasoning but by reading the whole passage.
He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That’s enough!” he replied.
It is very clear if you read this whole passage that Jesus simply wanted to be arrested so that a prophecy would be fulfilled. Consider also that Jesus rebukes Peter for trying to use one of the swords later ("all who take the sword will perish by the sword")
So, if you take the homosexuality stuff to heart, do you also believe, that if someone rapes a woman, that woman should have to marry the rapist?
Should women be forced to separate themselves from society when on their period?
Should women have to praise their husbands' names from the city gates?.
"If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride price for virgins." (Exodus 22:16-17) Imperfect but similar to the weregild practice. In this case, the bride price is the sentence imposed by law.
The second two aren't laws regarding sexual immorality (Acts 15:22 on).
I'm not turning you into a bad person, you are saying things that I find morally abhorrent and diseased. So I am objecting.
It would be nice if you could try to avoid calling people diseased and morally abhorrent. I realise you're attacking the beliefs not the person, but it comes down to the same thing. I don't call you diseased and abhorrent because you're bi, so please don't call Christians diseased and abhorrent for not approving of your sexual orientation.
So let me get this straight. Homosexuality is immoral and sinful.
If a man rapes a woman, depending on the father's wishes, she either has to marry him or he pays a fine.
I will call a gangrenous limb as I see it. No offense, but your belief preaches hate towards my existence. Me being bisexual (actually pansexual but whatever) does not affect you in anyway.
So you can see why I might refer to your belief as abhorrent.
I don't care whether those other two laws are regarding sex or not. They are silly, do you believe them?
What do you do in the instances the bible contradicts itself?
Is slavery acceptable to you?
Ephesians 5:22
Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.
Colossians 3:22
Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.
1 Timothy 6:1
All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God's name and our teaching may not be slandered.
Titus 2:9
Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them,