Does the scriptural narrative - which is the only basis for believe in the christian god besides personal revelation - have any validly over other tribal and superstitious claims? No.
The Scriptures followed by the Christian people are believed to have been inspired by God, thus the Saved believe in them. That's what faith
is. A Christian is going to believe in the Bible over any Pagan superstitions
because he is a Christian. That you're arguing with Christians—or those with knowledge on what Christians believe—seems to have escaped your thoughts.
Is there any evidence that this world, universe, or mankind was created? No, in fact the evidence disproves this.
Your purported evidence is merely a statement that scientists theorize a means by which the world came to be. If you truly believe that you are in possession of hard evidence that will cause the established Christian religion to collapse, you certainly seem to either be withholding this evidence or are doing a terrible job of showing this evidence. Explain then, more thoroughly, how we have proven that Man and the world are not created; that no divine hand had any part in their formation in any way; that they formed purely by chance.
Is there evidence that there is an afterlife? No, I think the opposite is true, as I have been trying to discuss.
You have put more thought and argument into this, I will admit—I would not use the phrase "discuss," myself—so I will entertain you with an answer. You have argued that the soul cannot exist, for the mind and chemical make-up of the body control how one acts, thinks, and lives. You are correct that much of what is controlled by the brain was once attributed to the soul, but now that wee have more knowledge, such attributions can be removed. We are still, however, left with the fundamentals: that within every human being—saved or unsaved—has
something inside him; a breath of life from God as a part of him that lives on through death. This is outside of the field of science, but you have refused to acknowledge this part of the soul in your arguments.
The human body was left imperfect after the Fall, thus its inner workings will vary, they will change, and they will break. But still the soul lives on, and is believed by the faithful to be immortal—barring a minority group which is inclined to disagree.
Is it likely that a being of infinite complexity acreated then created the universe, or is it more likely that the universe acreated? Given the nature of quantum foam, the latter is very likely.
I don't know; you seem to be the quantum foam expert here. Explain how this quantum foam is able to use made-up verbs to form the universe by its own will. I don't know anything about quantum foam, but I'm not inclined to believe whatever fancy-sounding words are thrown about just because they sound scientific.
Christianity is the believe that a 'loving' god created us sick and demands for us to become well on pain of eternal punishment.
Christianity states that God created us perfect in His image, but that He gave us free will. Our forebears were given a choice, and made the choice to defy their nature and allow Sin to enter Mankind. Christianity is also the belief that God continued to stand by His creation, entering into a covenant with Abram to father the Jewish people, and then sending a part of Himself to the world to undergo sacrifice to wash away the sins of the believers. Christianity is
also the belief that the faithful will, when the time comes, be caught up into the clouds to be in Heaven, and that they will live eternally in the New Jerusalem.
I don't know about you, but such actions seem fairly loving to me.
It is the religion that says the only chance we have is a cage trap hallway in which we are best ignoring so we don't suffer forever.
I am honestly not sure what you are trying to say.
It is a religious believe system that has no more validity then any other.
How so? The supernatural aspects must be taken upon one's faith, but Christ hasn't any teachings that ought not be followed. Christ teaches generosity, humility, and peace to Man. With what do you disagree?
I might add that I was a faithful christian for too much f my life, and this fact informs my repulsion. Despite my feelings about the religion itself I don't feel strongly against followers of it.
How can you claim to have no strong feelings against Christians when you admit to feeling repulsion at the very thought of being part of the religion? In any case, you certainly have no strong feelings against going to the Christian discussion thread to argue that certain doctrines are inherently wrong because of mostly unrelated and unexplained reasons.