A) The trinity isn't common to all chrisistanity.
Well, to the vast majority. It's certainly not a throw-away belief, at any rate.
B) A bit sad that he didn't share that info with everyone that killed in his name.
He did - through reason, natural moral law, etc. The sad thing is that no one listened.
God would disappear as well. My view is Panentheism, in which God at once transcends and pervades Creation.
Like a dwarf fortress player to dwarf fortress, got it.
Sort of, if you also made up the code by which the dwarves live and breathe and have their being.
In modern-ish terms, it's basically saying that God is the atomic structure of reality. Mind you, it'd probably be something quantum these days, but that's basically it.
Er, not really. God is in everything, but also transcends everything. I explained it very poorly, I'm afraid. I am unfamiliar with "Christian Materialism" but I can assure you that is not what I'm talking about at all.
Interesting. can you refer to further reading material about:
A) Sin is nothingness and nothingness is Sin.
B) That the "Natural order" you are speaking of and that is in the path of god and into god, is in fact a preexisting, predetermined godly manifested order and not men made order (When speaking about a moral order) and if such a godly manifested order has been established how can we, mortal men, know how to follow it if it keeps changing (If you are a Christian, then you are following certain laws that are attributed to Jesus yet are in conflict with Jewish laws, despite the christianity and Jesus acceptance of Moses as a true prophet.)
I take from many sources - Aquinas, Augustine, Chesterton, Lewis, and many more besides - but forget where I picked up what. However, I will tell you that I phrased (A) very poorly.
A is actually sin as an absence (of god), if you want to be particular
This is more what I meant. Sin isn't a "thing" that you "do": it's a "nothing" that you "not-do," or an absence of action. You don't murder someone, you fail to respect their right to life.
As for (B), the law has always been the same. The salvific quality of Mosaic law is... suspect in Christianity (fundamentalists notwithstanding). That's a terse answer, I realize, but you can probably find a more in-depth explanation in writings of early Church fathers.
So if God permeates the entirety of the universe and physical and moral laws exist as an extension of him, along with all matter and energy, doesn't this mean that humanity is thus divine and defines the shape of God? If everything is a reflection of God then a change in one part of the reflection is a change in God, correct?
If you look in a cracked mirror, will you crack?
In a sense, the universe (and hence humanity) is "divine." But it is
not God - God is not made up out of the universe, that would be pantheism which I explicitly stated was not what I was referring to. The universe does not define God, God defines the universe.
Another insufficient analogy to help explain what I mean: Creation is to God as organisms are to the planet Earth. They are, in one way, a part of Earth (ecosystems etc.) and they rely on it for their existence; but they are not necessary to it - the Earth was here long before life arose, and may be here long after all that life dies.
Obviously the big flaw here is that, if life was gone the Earth would be substantially different from what it is, while God would be completely the same even if the universe blinked out of existence, but hopefully you get the point.