TODAY’S TOP HEADLINES: Jegula International News, The Avalia World Post
Dental Lawsuit Continues to Escalate
September 16th, 2014
After the ruling of the case of Smiles, Inc. v Barbara Wilson in the Avalian Supreme Court earlier this month in favor of Smiles, Inc., representatives of plaintiff Barbara Wilson say that they plan to appeal the case again, this time bringing it to the newly established Committee to Promote Justice within the United Assembly, which claims international jurisdiction. They say that since Smiles, Inc. is an international corporation, the only entity that can reasonably bring it to justice is an international court. A legal representative for Smiles, Inc. indicated that the company plans to continue battling the suit.
The lawsuit was filed in April, when Barbara Wilson, then an employee of Smiles, Inc., alleged that her working conditions were poor, her benefits were abysmal, and she was paid less than her male colleagues. This appeal is the final step in what has been a lengthy and bitter fight through the entirety of the legal system. Representatives for the United Assembly say that they will receive a detailed court history, as well as a written case by both the defense and the prosecution, and will vote on a decision during the next forum of the Committee to Promote Justice. Meanwhile, some critics say that the CPJ is not a legitimate court, and does not have the authority to make legal decisions. It does not appear that Smiles, Inc. intends to challenge the legitimacy of the Committee at this time.
Smiles, Inc. Hints at United Assembly Contribution
September 16th, 2014
A spokesperson for the embattled Smiles, Inc. today announced that the company was considering a sizeable contribution of 500 million Avalian dollars as a public display of support for the newly founded United Assembly, but that plans have not been finalized. “We are not committing to this,” the spokesperson said. “We’ll see how things go.” This announcement comes in the midst of a protracted legal battle by Smiles, Inc. and the recent decision by… (continued on page 5)