One is me looking at the impact beneath why people voted whom. I disagree with both, given that the judgement is...superficial. It lies with how much force and power one inserts into their posts, poking at a degree of 'lax'ness, wherein the idea may also polarize back towards the voter; the # of votes a person has ties with how far people want lynches, eh?
OH HERE IT COMES. MAGNETISM. GRAVITY IS WEAKER THAN THAT.
BlitzDungeoneer (-1) - #Cheeetar#,TolyK, TolyK, TolyK, #Shakerag#, SuperBlackcat, Superblackcat
TheDarkStar (3) - Persus13, Jack A T, Persus13
Y'all say there's a tie between these two. We've got non-players rooting for Blitz :V
With a grand total of two players jumping on Blitz, and two players jumping on TDS.
Given the system of time in this game, we're limited without consensual extension--funny thing, given the easy abuse of vote-power and jumpiness of people towards those who seem lax, given my insight into the vote-process.
There's a lack of cases being pushed forward, and there's more a lack of people looking into how the day is being played; subtle details are being missed out, and today would turn to be a waste with this show at hand. Oh, and someone stole NQT's votes (or they're invisible :v)
SO, my point is, my vote isn't sticking on TDS, but rather as a placeholder to enforce a lynch instead of a no-lynch. Pity on Blitz, however, due to him being new and...actually really pretty hard to read given his posts this game. Same idea, however, goes to TDS--yeah, I get that you can 'prove' TolyK one way or another, however the judgement behind why TDS is being lynched is pretty...
Superficial.
Oh, and nyancat says hi.