Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Culise]

Would his probable death have been directly caused by the animal? 

[a1s]

is his profession relevant to the case?

[Avis-Mergulus]

Would his probable death have been directly caused by the animal? 

Very no.

is his profession relevant to the case?

Very yes. Well, more like occupation than profession, but yeah.

[Culise]

Did his occupation involve working with the animal? 

[MeimieFan88]

Did the animal eat the sausage?

[a1s]

Does his occupation involve production, transporting or consuming sausages?

[The Froggy Ninja]

Was the sausage ruse a distraction? (I have the detonator!)

[Avis-Mergulus]

Did his occupation involve working with the animal? 

Nope.

Did the animal eat the sausage?

Probably.

Does his occupation involve production, transporting or consuming sausages?

Not at all.

Was the sausage ruse a distraction? (I have the detonator!)

Nah.

[Culise]

For some reason, I've been getting an odd idea about it for a while now (to wit, the comedy-esque "guy stoops to feed a dog, something smashes into the wall next to him right where his head was a second before"), so I may as well ask something a bit more specific: did he feed the animal?  More pertinently, did the act of feeding the animal (or if he didn't feed it, his interaction with the animal in general) lead directly to him avoiding the danger that would have killed him? 

EDIT: Clarified the questions a bit.

[The Froggy Ninja]

To be clear I meant did he use the sausage as a distraction?

[Avis-Mergulus]

For some reason, I've been getting an odd idea about it for a while now (to wit, the comedy-esque "guy stoops to feed a dog, something smashes into the wall next to him right where his head was a second before"), so I may as well ask something a bit more specific: did he feed the animal?  More pertinently, did the act of feeding the animal (or if he didn't feed it, his interaction with the animal in general) lead directly to him avoiding the danger that would have killed him? 

EDIT: Clarified the questions a bit.

I will expand my answer a bit beyond the usual: he may have fed the animal, but that has no relevance to whether or not he survived. Feeding the animal was not essential to his survival.

To be clear I meant did he use the sausage as a distraction?

Again, no.

[ShadowHammer]

Did the animal survive?

Did "he" bring the sausage for the purpose of feeding it to this animal?

[Avis-Mergulus]

Did the animal survive?

Did "he" bring the sausage for the purpose of feeding it to this animal?

Yes.

Not exactly. The purpose might have entailed feeding it to the animal in the end, but that was not the entirety of the purpose or even its main point.

I think this one might be a bit...overpowered, yeah.

[ShadowHammer]

Was a sausage an unusual thing for him to bring?

If so, did he bring anything else out of the ordinary?

[Avis-Mergulus]

Was a sausage an unusual thing for him to bring?

If so, did he bring anything else out of the ordinary?

For a person of his occupation - no to both.