Your country supported the english in an attemp to steal more territory. Beacuse your country is so narrow like a fucking spaggetti and you live robbing territories like Tierra del Fuego and Paraguay.
If every talk between politicians was like this, the world would be a better place for 20 minutes. And those minutes would be golden.
Say that to my face, you noodle-bordered cur.
Sad. The arapaima was a neat fish.
It's not dead dead. It's just that no specimens were reported by specifically trained fishermen in a decent fraction of the places they checked for it.
And of course, the other areas weren't doing so well. I believe 5% were well-managed and 2% were un-fished, was the reported numbers.
Previously, bio economic theory predicted that fishing does not cause extinctions because fishermen inevitably move away from depleted resources.
The tragedy of the commons will always win over, killing the fishies.
Bio-eco... what? Sweet zeus, if that's the sort of BS fishing management and whatnot is following, no bloody wonder we're losing species.
Are there any actual occurrences of resource exploiters moving away from a resource that became unsustainably exploited before it was locally annihilated? Because that sounds like something similar in occurrence frequency to live jackalope captures, at least without some sort of outside interference going on.
Fishing industry in general?
Something's keeping other commercial fish from going extinct, and it's sure as hell not restraint or resolve.
That said, I am curious if this "theory" originated in respected circles or well-paid circles.