Yeah thanks "Neonivek? That moron... Whoa sorry, I almost took this discussion as something to take seriously" I feel so much love right now
--
Anyhow my post, rereading it, was sort of unclear (Well by unclear I mean for some reason I meant to say one thing but said a completely different thing)... What is odd is I remember what I meant, but I cannot find the post I was responding to when I was saying it.
It will be complex and unique on the strategy market.
Ahh misinterpreted that.
Anyhow my statement was more that the game's biggest issue is that it is unbalanced, though it is intentionally unbalanced, and the issue is only its ability to penetrate the strategy game scene, since right now the big thing is "balance to the point of tedium".
Not in terms of game quality.
Heck I have a term I like to call "Over balance" where a game, in seeking balance, will make everything boring.
Yeah I REALLY should have been more clear, but I have no idea why my post was like that. *Looks closer* 10AM!?! I stayed up all night and made a post at 10AM?
---
Though I should say that by asymmetric I mean even the way the different gods go about their business is different. They don't sort of fight on the same plane.
Also if we are going for Asymmetrical RTS games in terms of "Drastically different races" then the king would have to be Command and Conquer Generals... For JUST the Terrorist faction who just outright change the rules on how combat works.
Another asymmetric game is Masters of Orion not because the races are THAT different, but because the races are intentionally unbalanced like heck! Uncreative is like playing on hard mode and creative is probably the most powerful ability in the game.