Sheepy sheep-snip-
No response to me?
Nerjin's use of a kingmaker ability is suspect - he would have to be supremely confident in his own abilites over other peoples, and since he was willing to give scum an easy hammer on MBP based on emotion, that doesn't really add up.
Actually he leveled the idea and presented his stance on the moment--it is to be noted that it is a continuous and understandable stance, given Nerjin's outlook on MBP in the prior days.
However, narrow down reading to the orange part.
...It's like you're subtly saying both are town in that situation. o-o
And add in the factor of emotion--that's only purely known as a
result and not the intent, so the conclusion of such and such 'adding up' is already flawed.
One of the survivors is probably lying, and Toaster's been confirmed neutral. I don't feel like Toaster's actions line up with a SK's motive, so Silthuri looks like scum.
. . ."Probably?" What makes you say 'probably' instead of anything else? If 'probably', then is there any other suspect
other than the survivors?
Note in orange:
Check TolyK.(3-Shot, Night) Fill In The Blanks [target]: Choose one: learn the target’s alignment; or learn what action the target used during the Night; or both, and you can no longer use this ability.
Is Neutral pertaining directly to Survivor? Nein!
I mean, really. I do vividly recall TolyK poking at that exact ideology back in the thread but I'm busy being alone and sad here.
...Also, care to expound the purple part? You feel such... alright. Why?
Cheeetar's claim dribbled out over a series of posts(starting here), which he should know not to do by now.
T'would be weird to just claim BROTHAH! out of the blue, wouldn't it. Especially in this kind of situation--unless, by which I believe its a scum-move, he's using it as a ruse (because for some reason, nobody is contending me or making a serious case against me the whole game ._.) ...err, because of the parenthesis leading to a majority-conclusion to get him out of view.
But that's irrelevant at the moment as we're pretty much at straws--an idea to pull out for later if the foothold is secure, to use a metaphor.
I've my ideas on Cheeet using that tangent of thought but that'll only be relevant later, given the intensity of today.
UI's attack on Nerjin gave me a gut feeling of him being opportunistic scum jumping on an easy target, and his action claim last night was suspect.
His attack on Nerjin...being which one again?
Also action claim being. . .?
UI: Bodyguard Tiruin
This?
Ya could do with appending and answering the invisible 'why' at the end of your sentences.
Who do I think the scum are? 3 of: Silthuri, UI, Cheeetar, Nerjin. Cheeetar and Nerjin cannot both be scum, so I guess it must be Silthuri and UI and either one of them. The other is probably the SK, or it could be Toaster. If there's anything missing in my logic, tell me.
@Orange: Yes.
...How you got there.
Also I'm assuming three scum instead of four because the game is still going on.
Actually, since it's a kingmaker scenario with an SK around, it's possible for there to be four.
I don't fully understand how that's a possibility. If so: then oh wow my feelings >_>
ToasterTiruin:
D5 (TolyK): His ability trumps mine and stuck me with (Auto) Filller. Pointless since I can force it to not affect me.
And how does it trump yours, Toaster?
All I know is that it does. It's quite self-evident, given the description of the ability, what I got, and that TolyK is the sole person to not flip with a [REDACTED].
...It's self-evident because you can see it, yourself. Err...yeah.
Unless my semantics got messed up there, because knowing that is very different from 'yeah, it [just] does'.
TWS:
Also I'm assuming three scum instead of four because the game is still going on.
Actually, since it's a kingmaker scenario with an SK around, it's possible for there to be four.
If I'm right that Tiruin is scum and Cheeetar is brothered to her, then the count would make sense.
Could you illustrate it for us?
Author
Topic: BYOR 13 - Game Over: Thirteen (Read 259214 times)