TolyK:I still stand that Silthuri has been trying to stay under the radar and above the rocky ground.
And this is the most suspicious thing you've seen so far? You're not even pressuring her - that vote could hardly be any more passive.
I had an alignment investigation, now I have a role name/ability investigation. The action inspect was a bonus for the last-time use.
What do you mean, last time use? Explain, clearly, what results you get from an inspect, and why it changed.
No, I am wrong in that count then.
Also, is Silthuri your scum buddy?
No. Why do you accuse me of chainsawing when you admit that my point is valid? You obviously didn't examine that vote log very hard - did you just go for the first target that caught your fancy?
Jack:TheWetSheep: In addition to my issues with your predecessor, I have issues with your play. Specifically, your TolyK vote. Even for a newcomer to a very long game, this is light on content. There isn't a case, and the questions consist of a rhetorical question and a clarification request. Your next few questions to TolyK are a bit better, but you're barely there on him. Considering you've only really looked at TolyK today, there's an issue here.
I can't address your issues with Imp, but would you say I'm the lowest on content today? Many people haven't even voted, and
TolyK's and
Nerjin's votes are similarly low-content and low-pressure. I realize this doesn't mean I'm less guilty of it, but why are you focusing on only me?
What is your case on TolyK?
1. Asking for people's actions before claiming, which he would need to do if he was scum fakeclaiming.
2. A lazy, passive vote on Silthuri based partly on mistaken grounds that he doesn't remove even after the mistake is pointed out.
3. OMGUS on me after I point it out
Scripten: You don't
think anybody's primed? Shouldn't you know?