NQT did not respond to your comments or answer your question. You didn't follow up. Why not?
Why didn't you react to Nerjin's concerns, quoted in my question to him in this post?
Both lurker trackers I know of (think, ZU) are throwing errors. Would you offer link to a functional tracker?
Varee: Is not trying. First two posts started with complaints about quantity of posts and number of players. Posts have fairly low content. Asked one general question to 'whomever has time', about when lying is too much. Asked no other questions except defensive/appeasing ones to me "So Imp what do you really want me to do ?" Claimed to have seen nothing suspicious in play as of Aug 10th. Has stopped answering questions and seems to be acting spastically-defensively now. Claimed to have trouble with communication. Does not appear to be working towards a Town win, at least in his D1 game. Medium lean Scum
flabort: Nice activity. Talking, interacting, curious, all over the place, includes a lot of game and non-game based humor; extremely willing to put energy and space both into the game and into 'fun' that has little or nothing to do with chasing most wincons. Freely and widely asks questions; follows up on some of them. Is paying attention to conversations between players which do not directly include him, and reacts to and joins those discussions. Freely and rapidly votes and changes his vote; claims not to pay attention to where his vote is, or how most others have voted. Does not appear concerned with tracking specific individual actions, willing to consider 'us' as a whole and give the wrong people credit for actions of others. Extremely interested in role information, both in sharing something he claims is his and in discussing with multiple others what theirs might be. Slight lean town - primarily because of his engagement, involvement, and lack of self-protectiveness.
4maskwolf: Seems quick to lash with anger, both at self and others, states he is irritable when tired. Stated he's fed up with Mafia. Still does seem to be willing to play, stated he loved his role, and early game was lightly engaging with some players, random questions offered, some interest in talking about roles (his and others'). Grew defensive/offensive when Nerjin pressured him about post etiquette, but did not turn that interaction into scumhunting. Approved in concept with the miller lynch, but felt it was unfair to millers to do so. Got lightly involved in the miller lynch discussion. Offered questions to all, minimal/no follow up on the answers/lack of answers. Primarily directs scumhunting statements towards those who call him scummy. Slight lean scum, primarily for the 'leave me alone' feeling I get from him. In some of my past games, those I've interacted with who made me feel like I didn't want to talk to them - that's been a decent scumtell for me.
TolyK: Initially commented on the miller debate. Asked a question if it seemed necessary. Did not really participate in random questions. Has answered most questions directed to him and has involved himself mostly with those who have interacted with him. Seems to be 'shooting from the hip', at least comfortable with stating gut feeling assumptions and not following them with discussion to attempt to prove or disprove "Also, Nerjin is a third party, pretty sure." Recently made some interesting comments about his vote. When the original asker, Scripten, has gotten his answers I have some questions to ask. I'll post them right before day end if Scripten isn't answered sooner, in case I'm dead before dawn so it isn't lost. Primarily null read, but I'd really like to talk to him more now.
Scripten: Very little early engagement, initial posts after a few random questions were all rolefishing/humor-based/role-stating stuff. More recently stated 'Alright, caught up a bit' and appeared to start seriously playing. Is paying attention to some players, at least, has stated 'thoughts thus far' at the end of the weekend, talking about 6 players (2 called unreadable, a third marked as null tell). Very recently started a line of questioning with TolyK which shows some suggestion of scumhunting. Null read, but watching with interest.
Nerjin: Deep in role-play, from before game start. Either broke role, or showed role without presidential glamour in reaction to 'post ettiquette' used by 4maskwolf, otherwise has stayed tight to the role of a president being a president in public. Politicians are evasive and rarely state things directly, and Nerjin has been showing this from the start. His most focused scumhunting was towards NQT about flavor-hunting, but 4maskwolf got his vote for stating he didn't care if he lived or died and there's been no follow-up towards NQT after that one post, despite NQT having not responded at all to NQT's inquiries and concerns. Null read, still watching and thinking about him.
notquitethere: Involved and active. Focused early on Tiruin's miller claim, interrogating her extensively and intensively. Interacted with several other players to a far lesser extent, mostly to answer/ask questions without much prolonged followup. Did not respond to Nerjin's concerns about flavor-hunting. Acting somewhat like a leader "Everyone on Flabort's Case, he's engaged, he's voting people and posting: is he really the best Day 1 lynch candidate?" I've had trouble interpreting NQT before. The NQT I thought I knew I've never played with; the NQT of Witches' Coven: In the Heart of Darkness. When I played since with NQT, he seemed... different. I'm liking this one. Null read, cause NQT and hard to read.
Shakerag: Experienced, skilled player doing his job, whatever the wincon behind it is. Involved and following the thread, though that involvement seems feather-light (with a few harder punches) until he focused on flabort. Null read.
Cheeetar: Probably not playing a lyncher; he was my lyncher last BYOR and did not act anything like this. Opened the game with a 'gambit' in response to Tiruin's Miller claim, 'lynching the Miller is the best thing we can do right now', then asked people in ones and twos what they thought about the idea, with both positive and negative spin on the question asked different people "do you think my plan is incredibly stupid?" to "do you agree with my proposal?" Put a LOT of activity into interaction on all sides of the lynch the miller discussion for the first 24 hours of play. Then switched vote to our inactive, and continued discussion about millers where appropriate. Comparatively restful weekend, then back into the game with focus and vote on flabort, for shifting votes so rapidly, with additional suspicion of flabort for how he speaks to Shakerag vaguely about buddies. Weak lean town, this is one involved, active and paying attention curious player who none-the-less feels somehow 'off' to me. Can't point to why yet, so I give little value to that feeling for now.
Jack A T: Opened play (about a day into the game) with logic and facts about how millers don't know they have been investigated; also explained sides of miller strategy re: claim when. Continued focus on Cheeetar after rest, mainly about miller debates. Some random/focused questions to others. Got involved, staying involved, good follow through expected of an experienced player. Faint town lean; null read that gives an 'on' feel to me.
Silthuri: Under the radar. Only 3 posts so far. "I'm naturally inconspicuous. I'm always in the unknown bin..." Answered questions, asked only 2 questions, and those of the Nerjin, apparently very RVS. Has twice promised to post more at a specific time, the first was a couple days late and the second hasn't quite happened yet. Made one weird comment to Flabort that I've just asked for clarification about; that'll bug me until she has a chance to answer. Weak scum lean from complete lack of interactive involvement and skill at being 'under the radar'.
Tiruin: Miller claim. Very very busy with miller claim for first 30 hours or so. Had sad life issues happen recently. Distance from thread since. Very weak town lean from miller-based interaction; that felt Town to me, but need to see more to have more to interpret.
Jiokuy: Silent here. Mostly silent in his other mafia game since this one started. Last logged in less than 24 hours ago. Time to replace, maybe?
Toaster: Eye/migraine/LASIK issues. Involved in miller debate, a few random questions, keeps up with questions asks and remains lightly involved during this time of health-related post restriction. Says should be able to be more active this week, but so far has just posted a one liner about flabort's WIFOM since saying that. Null read of this skilled, health-afflicted player.
Persus13: Very low engagement so far. Opened with a few random question and an RVS vote on Shakerag. A few one liner/one word even posts. A few answers. A little engagement with the miller debate, specifically with Cheeetar. Voteswitch to 4maskwolf with stated 'avoid unnecessary WoT posts'. Some engagement with 4maskwolf over use of threats and disparity in vote use/reasons for voting for vote use. Somewhat involved but not engaged when questioned closely/with pressure from Jack A T and Shakerag, but little evidence of scumhunting and not much attempt to 'make his vote work', though he's kept it on 4maskwolf. Low lean Scum, seems to be happy to coast when he can.
IronyOwl: Low post count; 3 posts so far. Each has had nice content though. Opened with exploring on both sides of the miller debate and some random questions; followed up on miller debate, both sides, appears to be following the rest of the thread and interacting a little. Null read, haven't seen enough for all I like what I have seen.