Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Putnam]

Anyone know how to globally turn off [flier] short of edditing all raws and on a side note if I do edit all raws, can I renable em without new world.

1. There isn't one.
2. Yes, removing flier is one of those raw edits you can do in a single world.

Find in files is your friend here; just find in files [FLIER] and replace it with maybe just FLIER.

[Grey Goo]

So... That are raws for metals like titanium, uranium, mercury, etc? Want add few of them even if they are useless for dwarves, for now...

Also I need ideas for better titles for dwarves. Ideas, not pointing to entity file which is for me just useless lump of text without ideas. Duke and such aren't much dwarven titles, but can't find anything alternative, clean and simple...

[samanato]

Mercury could be usable for alchemy-related reactions.  (and in this time period, it's the only accessible one of the three, assuming it is the same era of technology) 

They can all be made as inorganic definitions, however, if only to make harder Forgotten Beasts.  Since mercury is liquid at room temperature, you might not want to use the metal-template for it, but define it from scratch (so weird things don't happen).  You can even attach a syndrome to the highly-toxic substance.  Unfortunately, there's no easy way to simulate radioactivity (you need DFHack for that, and it's not out yet for this version)

[Nero1024]

I have a question: Does the [NOFEAR] and/or [LIKES_FIGHTING] tokens negate the need for discipline? I hear that having discipline or [NATURAL_SKILL:DISCIPLINE:??] keeps creatures from running in fear from fights.

[ShinQuickMan]

I've heard anecdotes of dragons, who have both the [NOFEAR] and IIRC the [LIKES_FIGHTING] tags, running in fear when encountering even a mere peasant outsider adventurer.

[Sorcerer]

I've been toying around with the idea of making my own language file for my MLP mod, but is there a way to limit a vocabulary to certain words or does the game always use the full language_words.txt and just leave omitted words blank?

[IndigoFenix]

I have a question: Does the [NOFEAR] and/or [LIKES_FIGHTING] tokens negate the need for discipline? I hear that having discipline or [NATURAL_SKILL:DISCIPLINE:??] keeps creatures from running in fear from fights.

It's a personality value for BRAVERY, add [PERSONALITY:BRAVERY:100:100:100] to make creatures not run in fear.  It will not cause them to engage in combat in the first place, though.

The [POWER] tag no longer seems to work, presumably because the new spire-vault system now handles demon takeovers.  Anyone know if there's still a way of creating custom civ-dominating monsters?

[TheOnlySolitaire]

I have a question: Does the [NOFEAR] and/or [LIKES_FIGHTING] tokens negate the need for discipline? I hear that having discipline or [NATURAL_SKILL:DISCIPLINE:??] keeps creatures from running in fear from fights.

I've tested myself - the [NOFEAR] tag doesn't seem to work any more - i had it on a modded creature i had imported over to the new releaae, and the errorlog didn't like it.
The morale/personality stuff has overwritten the nofear tag i would guess. 

Thats just my finding in the errorlog though.


Also, interestingly, NONAUSEA and NOEXERT seem to no longer work - again, the errorlog threw them up.

[Spehss _]

NOFEAR, NONAUSEA, and NOEXERT are all still in the vanilla raws though. It's in creature_standard and everything. No mention of any issues in my errorlogs about it.

There's probably something up with your modded creature that's causing the errorlogs to print that.

[Knight Otu]

The [POWER] tag no longer seems to work, presumably because the new spire-vault system now handles demon takeovers.  Anyone know if there's still a way of creating custom civ-dominating monsters?

That's odd. My dark masters definitely have taken over civs, though it admittedly seems to happen less often (and they're night creatures rather than megabeasts, but surely that doesn't affect things?). You may have fewer civs that can be taken over now, perhaps?

[Greiger]

It seems DF accepts entries in the VALUE field of over 50.  I accidentally added an extra 0 to an entry (from 35 to 350) and suddenly every single one of the starting 7 really really REAALLY wanted a family.  I didn't see a single fortress member that didn't have the dream of having a family in their personality before I spotted the error.

[Putnam]

It seems DF accepts entries in the VALUE field of over 50.  I accidentally added an extra 0 to an entry (from 35 to 350) and suddenly every single one of the starting 7 really really REAALLY wanted a family.  I didn't see a single fortress member that didn't have the dream of having a family in their personality before I spotted the error.

Nice. Saiyans are gonna get a lot more warlike.

[Sergarr]

It seems DF accepts entries in the VALUE field of over 50.  I accidentally added an extra 0 to an entry (from 35 to 350) and suddenly every single one of the starting 7 really really REAALLY wanted a family.  I didn't see a single fortress member that didn't have the dream of having a family in their personality before I spotted the error.

Did that affect the speed of dwarf marriage?

[Greiger]

It did not as far as I could tell, but I only had about two seasons and one migrant wave full of lovey dovey dragonmen before I realized something had to be up.  Might not have given them time to start marrying.

[geoduck]

So are there any new occupations in 0.40.x? The graphics tileset I created just depicts dwarves, elves, goblins, humans and kobolds. I tested it a bit, and it appears to work fine under 0.40.x for the previously-existing occupations without changes, but if there's something new, I'd add it.