Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 47

Author Topic: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]  (Read 38514 times)

Kassire

  • Bay Watcher
  • The damning skull motif
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #240 on: July 11, 2014, 04:35:58 pm »

So I think I'm going to go with grey to indicate people who have gone already in the initiative order while green will indicate people who haven't gone yet.

Thoughts?
Seems good to me
Logged
All shall be well, and all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #241 on: July 11, 2014, 10:00:26 pm »

Yep. Clear, concise, and helpful.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Nerjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • A photo is worth 1,000 words... all: Guilty!
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #243 on: July 11, 2014, 11:05:50 pm »

Huh... I just looked deeper into this weapon finesse thing. Doesn't KJ have to specify which weapon it applies to?
Logged
The demon code prevents me from declining a rock-off challenge.

Is the admiral of the SS Lapidot.

kj1225

  • Bay Watcher
  • A tricky dick that can't be impeached
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #244 on: July 11, 2014, 11:16:51 pm »

That's what I asked when someone else took it and they said no.
Logged

Nerjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • A photo is worth 1,000 words... all: Guilty!
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #245 on: July 11, 2014, 11:23:36 pm »

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.
Logged
The demon code prevents me from declining a rock-off challenge.

Is the admiral of the SS Lapidot.

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #246 on: July 11, 2014, 11:27:29 pm »

Why would it? Okay, to be fair, the wording is slightly unhelpful in that regard, considering that it follows the same naming pattern as Specialization, Focus, &c., but read the text compared to those. They all contain the phrase "Choose one type of weapon...", whereas Weapon Finesse doesn't.

Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?


Also, use brackets for rolls, because [8] vs. (8).     :P
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Rolepgeek

  • Bay Watcher
  • They see me rollin' they savin'~
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #247 on: July 11, 2014, 11:31:06 pm »

Or use parentheses. (8) See?
Logged
Sincerely, Role P. Geek

Optimism is Painful.
Optimize anyway.

Kassire

  • Bay Watcher
  • The damning skull motif
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #248 on: July 11, 2014, 11:51:48 pm »

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.
It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?
Logged
All shall be well, and all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well

Nerjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • A photo is worth 1,000 words... all: Guilty!
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #249 on: July 12, 2014, 12:00:23 am »

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.
It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?

For everyone else yes. It was just that time with him.

Also, just a hint: If I mess osmething up please inform me and I'll try to fix it as soon as possible.
Logged
The demon code prevents me from declining a rock-off challenge.

Is the admiral of the SS Lapidot.

Nerjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • A photo is worth 1,000 words... all: Guilty!
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #250 on: July 12, 2014, 12:03:04 am »

Why would it? Okay, to be fair, the wording is slightly unhelpful in that regard, considering that it follows the same naming pattern as Specialization, Focus, &c., but read the text compared to those. They all contain the phrase "Choose one type of weapon...", whereas Weapon Finesse doesn't.

True, it doesn't.

Quote
Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?

I... Think that can be allowed. Yeah... I don't see why not.

Quote
Also, use brackets for rolls, because [8] vs. (8).     :P

Alrighty... can do! Brackets for rolls with parentheses for damage.
Logged
The demon code prevents me from declining a rock-off challenge.

Is the admiral of the SS Lapidot.

kj1225

  • Bay Watcher
  • A tricky dick that can't be impeached
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #251 on: July 12, 2014, 12:04:37 am »

You can turn smileis off.

 8) Like so.
Logged

Kassire

  • Bay Watcher
  • The damning skull motif
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #252 on: July 12, 2014, 12:05:35 am »

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.
It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?

For everyone else yes. It was just that time with him.

Also, just a hint: If I mess osmething up please inform me and I'll try to fix it as soon as possible.
Meh, I just realized I also made a mistake with another of my own actions, but that'll be addressed when it's my turn again.
Logged
All shall be well, and all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: "Upon the High Seas: Age of Abandon" - 3.5 DnD OOC Thread [Full]
« Reply #253 on: July 12, 2014, 08:16:44 am »

You can turn smileis off.

 8) Like so.
Can you just turn off the sunglasses emoticon? :V

Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?
I... Think that can be allowed. Yeah... I don't see why not.
Sounds good. It also gives me a good reason to take Weapon Focus: Rapier, which I liked for flavor reasons but dislike for being a sorta bad feat if you aren't going to be following it down that tree.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Silthuri

  • Bay Watcher
  • Having a good ol' time lurking about.
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: July 12, 2014, 11:22:22 pm by MyOwnWorstEnemy »
Logged
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 47